Teams

BELVEDERE TC 18AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Casey Wall
published 3
3.05
Shari Jones
published
2.91
Brandi Hudson
published 3
2.89
Stacy Perry
published
2.78
Shirin Birjandi
published
2.69
Dana Sheldon
published 3
2.66
Kirsty Ellis
published
2.64
Noa Schult
published
2.64
2.59
Courtney Welch
published 3
2.55
Lizi Cruz
published
2.55
Nooshin Behroyan
published
2.51
Marny Homan
published
2.45
Zoe Johns
published
2.41
Elisa Donovan
published
Nicole Krouse
published
Paula Pitcher
published
Priya Femmer
published
Rebecca Aherne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Sheldon + Brandi Hudson314 matchesnot enough data
Shari Jones + Shirin Birjandi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Casey Wall
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Shari Jones
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Brandi Hudson
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Stacy Perry
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Shirin Birjandi
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Dana Sheldon
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Kirsty Ellis
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Noa Schult
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Maile Bright Denzler
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Courtney Welch
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Lizi Cruz
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Nooshin Behroyan
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Marny Homan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Zoe Johns
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Elisa Donovan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.41
Nicole Krouse
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Pitcher
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Priya Femmer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Aherne
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.