Teams

KWankhedkar (Park Road)

2026 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-26vs DGlass (Park Road)Won 21
L#1 SinglesDeborah Smith-Shaw vs Alli Petersen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Galvin vs Ashley Bejsovec6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesGillian Rhew vs Madison Stimson6-3, 6-3
2026-07-20vs ABoulton-Samuels (Piper Glen)Split 11
W#1 SinglesDeborah Smith-Shaw vs Lindsay DS6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesLinda Jo Mastrangelo vs Adriana Boulton-samuels4-6, 4-6
2026-06-22vs DGlass (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesGillian Rhew vs Madison Stimson6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKashmira Wankhedkar vs Julie Fisher6-1, 6-1
2026-06-08vs ABoulton-Samuels (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Galvin vs Hannah Lambert6-4, 6-2
2026-06-05vs ABoulton-Samuels (Piper Glen)Split 11
W#1 SinglesEmily Reel vs Anna Medica6-4, 7-5
L#3 SinglesKashmira Wankhedkar vs Lindsay DS2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-01vs DGlass (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDeborah Smith-Shaw vs Madison Stimson6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEmily Reel vs Lindsey Vliet6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLinda Jo Mastrangelo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KWankhedkar (Park Road)60144894
2DGlass (Park Road)2481022177
3ABoulton-Samuels (Piper Glen)1551327182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.54
Gillian Rhew
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.53
Deborah Smith-Shaw
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.50
Meagan Maddox
published
2.37
Suzanne Galvin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.36
Kashmira Wankhedkar
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.34
Emily Reel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
23W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Gillian Rhew
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%39%61%
2.54
2.5
Deborah Smith-Shaw
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53
Meagan Maddox
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Suzanne Galvin
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Kashmira Wankhedkar
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Emily Reel
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.