Teams

Mischief Managed

2025 Montgomery Mixed 18 & Over · Montgomery Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.58 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-04-04vs Double the FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesManu Balasubramanian / Kanika Sabor vs Koby Bonta / Jin Lei4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-17vs Double the FunWon 20
W#1 DoublesMehrban Iranshad / Caitlin Lee vs Nathalie Davis / Justin Purkey6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEkaterina Potapova / Brian Mead vs Henry Cha / Simone Feldman5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-06vs Wasabi 9.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAustin Blake / Kanika Sabor vs Matt Stillwagon / Erin Green4-6, 5-7
2025-03-03vs Double the FunWon 20
W#2 DoublesMehrban Iranshad / Kanika Sabor vs Henry Cha / Nathalie Davis6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Cinoman / Jenna Gietl vs Elizabeth McCann / Phillip Ramil6-3, 6-2
2025-02-19vs Wasabi 9.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Mead / Ekaterina Potapova vs James Daniel Kohr II / Aisha Bhimla3-6, 3-6
2025-02-15vs Double the FunLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Mahaney / Gillian Lee vs Koby Bonta / Jin Lei6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-04vs Wasabi 9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Hughes / Kanika Sabor vs Iosua Malaki / Michele Brammer6-4, 6-2
2025-01-31vs Double the FunLost 01
L#2 DoublesEkaterina Potapova / Renaldo Savady vs Jin Lei / Prem Vadlamudi3-6, 4-6
2025-01-16vs Wasabi 9.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Cinoman / Jenna Gietl vs Matt Stillwagon / Erin Green1-6, 4-6
2025-01-13vs Double the FunSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTara Jakubik / Michael Mahaney vs Matt Morgan / Christine Becer7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMehrban Iranshad / Carolyn Greis vs Christen Harsha / Phillip Ramil4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-01-07vs Wasabi 9.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesManu Balasubramanian / Kanika Sabor vs Inese Williamson / Juan Jose Tijero6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Ekaterina Potapova
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.75
4.71
Austin Blake
published 5
4.69
Bartol Letica
published 5
4.52
Caitlin Lee
published 4.5
4.46
Michael Mahaney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.45
Mehrban Iranshad
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.36
Aravind Krishna
published 5
4.31
Jenna Gietl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Ryan Cinoman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Kanika Sabor
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.14
Kasey Kinney
published
3.83
Renaldo Savady
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Brian Mead
published 4
3.79
Carolyn Greis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.54
Laura McInerney
published
Gillian Lee
published
Kristin Quackenbush
published
Tara Jakubik
published
Yiran Liu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Mahaney + Tara Jakubik5453% games−0.5% vs expected
Renaldo Savady + Carolyn Greis2644% games−2.5% vs expected
Mehrban Iranshad + Ekaterina Potapova15760% games−3.9% vs expected
Renaldo Savady + Ekaterina Potapova4254% gamesnot enough data
Mehrban Iranshad + Kasey Kinney134 matchesnot enough data
Jenna Gietl + Brian Mead314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Mahaney + Kanika Sabor134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ekaterina Potapova
121W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.83
Manu Balasubramanian
40W–8L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.75
5
Austin Blake
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.71
5
Bartol Letica
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.69
4.5
Caitlin Lee
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.52
4.5
Michael Mahaney
81W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
5
Mehrban Iranshad
126W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.45
5
Aravind Krishna
37W–48L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.36
4.5
Jenna Gietl
133W–117L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Ryan Cinoman
125W–85L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Kanika Sabor
128W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
Kasey Kinney
111W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
4.14
4
Renaldo Savady
224W–182L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Brian Mead
33W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Carolyn Greis
583W–372L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Laura McInerney
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Gillian Lee
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Jakubik
36W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yiran Liu
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.