Teams

SD HT SDTRC/ Channick

2023 Mixed Doubles Tri-Level Fall - SD · SD (9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.20 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-11vs SD HT Balboa TC/ ChungWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobin Maher / Rory Kish vs Mikayla Vincent / Kellen Sabhlok6-2, 6-0
2023-11-01vs SD LLW HT Mtn View/ ReyesLost 01
L#2 DoublesScott Atwood / Robin Maher vs Madeleine West / Tommy West2-6, 4-6
2023-10-28vs SD HT Mtn View/ AlvarezWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrittany Swenson / Michael Stefanski vs Karen Victoria Garcia Castro / Diego Covarrubias Orozco6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobin Maher / Rory Kish vs Raymundo Landavazo / Sara Fairbank6-0, 1-6, 1-0
2023-10-21vs SD HT Balboa TC/ ChungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Stefanski / Robin Maher vs Cale Carson / Thanh Chung1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRamiro Muzquiz / Kim Schwab vs Dee Domingo / Kelly Jernigan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-14vs SD HT Coronado HS/ PhillipsLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobin Maher / Scott Atwood vs Kellie McMullen / Charles Hamori3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-09-30vs SD HT Pacific Beach TC/ MaurizWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Atwood / Robin Maher vs LUISA BAKAY / Timothy Searcy7-6, 6-1
2023-09-23vs SD HT Mtn View/ AlvarezWon 10
W#3 DoublesKim Schwab / William White vs Luisa Garcia de la Cabada / Alejandro Enrique Phillips Escobar6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-09vs SD WC HT Peninsula TC/ MartinezLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Stefanski / Brittany Swenson vs Claudia Roehr / Andrew Tek2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Lemeshewsky / Marc Channick vs Nina Keller / Peter Yuen1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD (9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.57
Brittany Swenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.24
Linda Milburn
published
4.22
Lora Moore
published
4.16
Eric Dahms
published 4
4.11
Gretchen Shaffer
published
4.01
Marc Channick
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.90
Kerry Ott
published
3.86
Scott Atwood
published
3.82
Kim Schwab
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Robin Maher
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.48
Mary Garvey
published
3.46
Ramiro Muzquiz
published
Jose Ruelas
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brittany Swenson
80W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.57
Linda Milburn
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
4.24
Lora Moore
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
4
Eric Dahms
13W–15L career · type S · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
4.16
Gretchen Shaffer
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.11
4
Marc Channick
202W–81L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
Kerry Ott
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.90
Scott Atwood
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Kim Schwab
90W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Robin Maher
35W–58L career · 6 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
Mary Garvey
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.48
Ramiro Muzquiz
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
3.46
Jose Ruelas
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.