Teams

CV-Ringer/Roth

2026 CV Masters' 70s League · CV-Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-19vs CV-Gellner/Willsey/AustinWon 51
W#1 DoublesSusan Mayer / Kenzie Thompson vs Susan Patrick / Leslie Zauher7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEileen Clark / Jenny Carson vs Hiyam van der Wilde / Blair Stone6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Crampton / Monica Sabo vs Pamela Hay / Paula Wells6-1, 6-1
W#4 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Donna Dornes / Barbara Johnson6-1, 6-4
W#5 DoublesDonna Peterson / MaryLynn Murphy vs Petra Gellner / Karen Felton6-1, 6-4
L#6 DoublesJudy Hobbs / Nancy Yazel vs Mary Austin / Mary Jane Toolson3-6, 1-6
2026-02-12vs CV-Giacomini/WilliamsWon 41
W#1 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Kenzie Thompson vs Sharon Williams / Patti Groves6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnn Crampton / Susan Mayer vs Jandi Fraser / Marie Allman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEileen Clark / MaryLynn Murphy vs Anita Chatigny / Nadine Kim6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Donna Simpson vs Ellen Boyer / Janet Daniel4-0
W#5 DoublesNora Vrabek / Monica Sabo vs Trudy Wallace / Wendy Zimmer6-4, 6-3
2026-02-05vs CV-ParkersonSplit 33
L#1 DoublesKim Davis / Colleen Muhlbradt vs Marjo Hull / Thelma Sahara5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Crampton / Susan Mayer vs Edna Swart / Jane True5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Donna Shawhan / Lois Owens6-2, 7-5
L#4 DoublesPeggy Solan / Lynne Washington vs Barbara Shelley / Jane Peller2-6, 0-6
W#5 DoublesMaryLynn Murphy / Theresa Brown vs Margaret Huck / JUDY MCLENNAN6-2, 7-5
L#6 DoublesMarianne Roth / Nancy Yazel vs Roberta Dierks / Gail Stewart2-6, 0-6
2026-01-29vs CV-Gellner/Willsey/AustinLost 24
L#1 DoublesKim Davis / Colleen Muhlbradt vs Donna Folster / Susan Patrick3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAnn Crampton / Susan Mayer vs Marne Albracht / Deborah Rogers4-1
L#3 DoublesJenny Carson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Blair Stone / Hiyam van der Wilde3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesNora Vrabek / Theresa Brown vs Karen Lord / Pamela Hay2-6, 4-6
W#5 DoublesNancy Yazel / Judy Hobbs vs Petra Gellner / Karen Felton5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#6 DoublesMaggie Maita / Susan Haley vs Joan Edwards / Mary Jane Toolson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-22vs CV-Giacomini/WilliamsSplit 33
W#1 DoublesSusan Devereaux / Colleen Muhlbradt vs Sharon Williams / Susan Vance6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Crampton / Susan Mayer vs Jandi Fraser / Susan Markowitz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEileen Clark / Jenny Carson vs Melanie Miller / Janet Daniel6-0, 6-0
W#4 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Renee Caldwell / Ellen Boyer6-0, 6-1
L#5 DoublesPeggy Solan / Lynne Washington vs Carel James / Trudy Wallace3-6, 3-6
L#6 DoublesTheresa Brown / Nancy Yazel vs Kathleen Novarro / Wendy Zimmer3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-01-15vs CV-ParkersonWon 42
L#1 DoublesSusan Devereaux / Kim Davis vs Marjo Hull / Thelma Sahara5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Mayer / Ann Crampton vs Edna Swart / Donna Shawhan6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesEileen Clark / Jenny Carson vs Michele Weddle / Gina Orban6-4, 7-5
W#4 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Donna Simpson vs Jane True / Debra Griffith5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#5 DoublesNora Vrabek / Kathy High vs Susan Walker / Laura Preston6-1, 6-1
L#6 DoublesMarianne Roth / Nancy Yazel vs Jane Peller / Barbara Shelley0-6, 2-6
2026-01-08vs CV-Gellner/Willsey/AustinLost 24
L#1 DoublesHeather Fiscalini / Kim Davis vs Patrice Dicasparro / Carmen Almodovar0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Crampton / Susan Mayer vs Marne Albracht / Deborah Rogers6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEileen Clark / Jenny Carson vs Mary Austin / Barbara Johnson6-1, 6-0
W#4 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Paula Wells / Hiyam van der Wilde7-5, 6-2
L#5 DoublesMaggie Maita / Theresa Brown vs Joan Edwards / Carine Topal6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#6 DoublesLynne Washington / Judy Hobbs vs Petra Gellner / Karen Felton1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · CV-Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CV-Ringer/Roth43241841332
2CV-Parkerson43192352381
3CV-Giacomini/Williams34212149369
4CV-Gellner/Willsey/Austin34202249376
5CV-70s Placeholder000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Donna Simpson
usually #4 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.52
Colleen Muhlbradt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Rebecca Bratlien
usually #4 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.16
Ann Crampton
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Donna Peterson
usually #5 Doubles 100% · published
Eileen Clark
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Heather Fiscalini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Carson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Judy Hobbs
usually #6 Doubles 67%, also #5 Doubles 33% · published
Kathy High
usually #5 Doubles 100% · published
Kenzie Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lynne Washington
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #6 Doubles 33% · published
Maggie Maita
usually #5 Doubles 50%, also #6 Doubles 50% · published
Marianne Roth
usually #6 Doubles 100% · published
MaryLynn Murphy
usually #5 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Monica Sabo
usually #5 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Yazel
usually #6 Doubles 80%, also #5 Doubles 20% · published
Nora Vrabek
usually #5 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Peggy Solan
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #5 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Devereaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Haley
usually #6 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Bratlien + Donna Simpson6070% gamesnot enough data
Jenny Carson + Eileen Clark404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Simpson
10W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
4
Colleen Muhlbradt
109W–92L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Rebecca Bratlien
35W–68L career · 7 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Ann Crampton
51W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Donna Peterson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Eileen Clark
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Heather Fiscalini
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jenny Carson
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Judy Hobbs
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy High
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kenzie Thompson
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynne Washington
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maggie Maita
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marianne Roth
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
MaryLynn Murphy
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Sabo
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Yazel
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nora Vrabek
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peggy Solan
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Devereaux
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Haley
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.