Teams

Kilauea Heat

2023 Adult 40 and Over League · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-18vs Kilauea FireLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeigh Bovaird / Kathleen Libao-Laygo vs Yuka Willis / Yoko Engelhardt2-6, 1-6
2023-03-11vs Kilauea BlazeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaryn Lee / Kathleen Libao-Laygo vs Grace Leong / Tracey Lyum3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeigh Bovaird vs Cheryl Hay6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-25vs Kilauea BlazeLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Humber / Nancy Vo vs Cheryl Hay / Darcy Rieches0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Libao-Laygo vs Courtney Lin0-6, 2-6
2023-01-28vs Kilauea FireLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Libao-Laygo / Nancy Vo vs Sharyl Shultz / Yuka Willis2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLeigh Bovaird vs Yoko Engelhardt1-6, 0-6
2023-01-14vs Kilauea BlazeLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeigh Bovaird / Cheryl Kim vs Tracey Lyum / Darcy Rieches0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Humber vs Cheryl Hay1-6, 0-6
2023-01-07vs Kilauea FireWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaryn Lee / Kathleen Libao-Laygo vs Jhoanna Mabutas / Sharyl Shultz6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLeigh Bovaird vs Ryo Shinozaki6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kilauea Blaze4173754
2Kilauea Fire2244863
3Kilauea Heat14371594

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Madeleine Dreith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Cheryl Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Kathleen Libao-Laygo
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.11
Emily Humber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Karyn Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leigh Bovaird
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Madeleine Dreith
58W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
3
Cheryl Kim
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Libao-Laygo
8W–6L career · 5 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.48
2.5
Emily Humber
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Karyn Lee
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Leigh Bovaird
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.