← Teams

MTC Marks

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-01vs MAC Snow (4.5)Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesLyman Brown / Patrick Survello vs Colin Atkinson / Adam Hamilton4-6, 2-6
2023-10-19vs Woodlake EstesLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesPatrick Survello / Lyman Brown vs Wieslaw Gumulak / Mikhil Sanduria6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2023-10-11vs Magnolia Green Sebetic / GruhlLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesLyman Brown / Tom Pollard vs Matt Sebetic / Geoff Usher3-6, 3-6
2023-10-04vs CCV AveryLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesPatrick Survello / Lyman Brown vs Scott Harrison / John Cronly4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-09-15vs ACAC RichmanLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSimon Sjogren / Lyman Brown vs En-Tien Chen / Keith Adams4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Andrew Kristensen
published 4.5
3.55
Chris Pecci
published 4
3.50
Lyman Brown
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Colin Keyser
published 3.5
3.13
Tracy Marks
published —
3.06
Bryan Jones
published 3.5
—
Tom Pollard
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Pecci + Colin Keyser5–060% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Kristensen
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
4.24
4
Chris Pecci
7W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Lyman Brown
182W–202L career · 5 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Colin Keyser
19W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
—
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Bryan Jones
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06
—
Tom Pollard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.