Teams

HRCA-N RED

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-03vs PH REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnita Kinder / Teresa Orr vs Barbara Meyers / Lisa Rosen6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetsy Heggie / Julia Zawalski vs Bobbie Brandon / Judith Ericson6-4, 6-3
2023-07-27vs LEBTC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Beers / Anita Kinder vs Jeanne Dearth / Margie Walsh2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Hoganson / Susan Holt vs Susan Conroy / Carol Avery6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBetsy Heggie / Judy Monahan vs Patricia Edwards / Nancy Hong5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-07-20vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulia Zawalski / Beth Beers vs Christie Bibeau / Sonja Hayen6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Holt / Anita Kinder vs Judith Quinn / Joyce Naylon6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-13vs PH REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnita Kinder / Julia Zawalski vs Mary Hobson / Lisa Rosen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Hoganson / Elaine Achterberg vs Linda Rengel / Barbara Meyers4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-06vs LEBTC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesElaine Achterberg / Julia Zawalski vs Carol Avery / Susan Conroy3-6, 2-6
2023-06-29vs LEBTC ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesAnita Kinder / Teresa Orr vs Christie Bibeau / Sonja Hayen5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJudy Monahan / Laura Hoganson vs Judith Quinn / Sandi Plude3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Beth Beers
published 3.5
3.10
Anita Kinder
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.90
Laura Hoganson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Betsy Heggie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Julia Zawalski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Judy Monahan
published
Kathleen Turner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Beers + Anita Kinder8458% games+6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Beers
18W–20L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Anita Kinder
77W–73L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Laura Hoganson
50W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Betsy Heggie
72W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Julia Zawalski
20W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Judy Monahan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Turner
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.