Teams

CP-Quicksilver Space Cowboys-Liu

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Jason Liang
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Daniel Warren
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
Results5 ties
2024-05-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Warren / Frank Taylor vs Matt Dunbar / Zhe Yang6-3, 6-2
2024-05-18Split 11
L#1 DoublesJason Liang / Frank Taylor vs Ajay Radhakrishnan / Steve Chavez6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Warren / Kaushik Purohit vs Chris Steck / Jeff Au-Yeung6-0, 6-0
2024-04-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesJason Liang / Robert Liu vs Ken Rapkin / Teddy Chen6-0, 6-0
2024-04-05Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJason Liang vs Cody McKee6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Warren / Matt Rainey vs Dylan Miyasaki / Kevin Kang6-2, 7-5
2024-03-24Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMatt Rainey / Daniel Warren vs Ciprian Clinciu / Mihai Petriuc6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaushik Purohit / Jason Liang vs Mihail Frintu / Alexandru Herman6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jason Liang
90W–72L career · type A
2%98%0%
3.20
3
Daniel Warren
79W–79L career
0%61%39%
3.08

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.