Teams

*3-VStiebris-HS-55 3.5

2024 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-02vs *1-SClark-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesValdis Stiebris / David Stefan vs Steve Pigora / Carl Laird5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDave Thomas / David Evert vs Brian Bornstein / Glen Hacker2-6, 2-6
2024-04-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Michael Holt vs Doug Lauen / T Powell6-2, 6-2
2024-04-18vs *2-SRyan-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Konvalinka / Valdis Stiebris vs Stephen Ryan / Bob Stocking6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Macdonald / David Evert vs Dan Tudor / Doug Kopec2-6, 1-6
2024-04-11vs *4-NBuckley-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Demarest / Valdis Stiebris vs Glen Blumhardt / Greg Duncan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-05vs *1-SClark-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesRalph Russo / Valdis Stiebris vs Bert Clancey / William Samson6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Evert / Michael Holt vs Glen Hacker / Andy Holloman6-2, 6-4
2024-04-04vs *6-RGildehaus-YMCA-55Lost 01
L#3 DoublesValdis Stiebris / David Evert vs Vincent Illiano / David Hubacher2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-21vs *5-RKern-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesSamuel Brock / David Evert vs Donald Emmett / Kwok-Wai Tsang3-6, 4-6
2024-03-14vs *2-SRyan-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Michael Holt vs Timothy Buckley / Dan Tudor7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-02-29vs *6-RGildehaus-YMCA-55Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Evert / Craig Demarest vs Michael Meyers / Ed Holub2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Michael Holt
published
3.15
Ralph Russo
published
3.14
Mark Macdonald
published
3.13
David Stefan
published 3.5
3.11
Scott Hartman
published
3.08
Valdis Stiebris
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.95
Dave Thomas
published 3
2.87
David Evert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valdis Stiebris + David Evert123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Holt
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Ralph Russo
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Mark Macdonald
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
David Stefan
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Scott Hartman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Valdis Stiebris
57W–72L career · 7 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Dave Thomas
17W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
David Evert
35W–53L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.