Teams

Me.Heath18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-22vs Ch.Felmet18C5.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Kelly Coble vs Tacey Hesmer / Betsy Carr2-6, 1-6
2023-09-21vs Je.Eskildsen18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Lindsey Taylor vs Katherine Bratton / Carson Schuch6-4, 6-2
2023-09-12vs Je.Eskildsen18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Meagan Heath vs Jessica Swaney / Katharine Merritt6-2, 6-2
2023-09-08vs Sh.Brodsgaard18C5.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Claire See vs Andrea Overfield / Lauren Daigle5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-09-07vs Da.Rusnak18C5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatie White / Adria McGlamery vs Lauren Hardwick / Amy Cagle6-1, 6-2
2023-09-01vs Da.Rusnak18C5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Marciny Trice vs Heather Word / Brittany Shumaker6-1, 6-1
2023-08-23vs Tr.Manger18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Meagan Heath vs Taryn Backus / Katelyn Steadman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-03vs Je.Eskildsen18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Dennison / Adria McGlamery vs Carly Kouskolekas / Stephanie Tracey4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Adria McGlamery
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Lindsey Taylor
published
2.74
Jennifer Bissette
published
2.64
Ashley Poston
published 3
2.58
Meagan Heath
published
2.56
Taylor Cheek
published
2.45
Amanda Falsone
published 3
2.34
Emily Warren
published
Marciny Trice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adria McGlamery + Lindsey Taylor4647% games+4.2% vs expected
Meagan Heath + Taylor Cheek134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Bissette + Taylor Cheek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adria McGlamery
54W–32L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
2.90
Lindsey Taylor
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Jennifer Bissette
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Ashley Poston
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Meagan Heath
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
Taylor Cheek
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
2.56
3
Amanda Falsone
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.45
MaryAdelaide Riddick
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.34
Emily Warren
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marciny Trice
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.