Teams

Falvey 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 18 & Over Men Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Cochran 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephen Keaney / Johan Nordmark vs J Stacey Allred / Conner McGowan6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTommy Houston / Corey Davis vs Samraat Saxena / Chuck Burns5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Freed / Lee Thompson vs Caleb Wilson / Eric Nocera3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesAndy Rutledge / Johan Nordmark vs Matt Hughes / Jeremy Madrazo7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLee Thompson / Myron Herron vs Kenny Winter / Rich Dowler4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAndy Rutledge / Corey Davis vs Brian Johnson / Bryan Jones3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTommy Houston / Myron Herron vs Fred Ortmann / Brian McLeod6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.5 18 & Over Men Thurs PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fleihan/Winter 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM2051340
2Cochran 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM1021225
3Gamble/Cardinal 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM1133762
4Falvey 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM0112430
5Beuchat 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM02151172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Tommy Houston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.21
Andy Rutledge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Stephen Keaney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Brad Falvey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Johan Nordmark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Corey Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Myron Herron
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Craig Freed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Lee Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Johan Nordmark + Andy Rutledge213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tommy Houston
29W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Andy Rutledge
9W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
Stephen Keaney
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Brad Falvey
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Johan Nordmark
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Corey Davis
47W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Myron Herron
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Craig Freed
11W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.46
Lee Thompson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.