Teams

Hampton Hall Highly Strung

Adult Team Tennis · 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.41 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Tim Albert
published
3.80
James Diaz
published 4
3.61
Debbie Picano
published 4
3.60
David Kehres
published 3.5
3.44
Tom Bulat
published
3.39
Randy Marcotte
published
3.36
Theresa Terschan
published
3.36
Alice Dalatri
published 3.5
3.25
James Kurdek
published 3.5
David Landrum
published 3.5
3.24
Erin Ussery
published 3.5
3.13
Jeanette Shultz
published
3.08
Lisa Odell
published
3.04
Betty Sapir
published 3
2.79
Gale Brown
published 3
Gerry Hall
published 3
Laurie White
published
Pat Conti
published
Ralph Kozak
published
Rich Raspet
published
Susie Morgan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Terschan + Alice Dalatri4149% games+1.4% vs expected
Lisa Odell + Theresa Terschan134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Odell + Alice Dalatri224 matchesnot enough data
David Kehres + James Diaz404 matchesnot enough data
Jeanette Shultz + Alice Dalatri134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Albert
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
James Diaz
55W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Debbie Picano
39W–41L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
David Kehres
33W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
Tom Bulat
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Randy Marcotte
29W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Theresa Terschan
35W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Alice Dalatri
17W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
James Kurdek
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
David Landrum
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Erin Ussery
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Jeanette Shultz
29W–29L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Lisa Odell
14W–26L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Betty Sapir
66W–57L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Gale Brown
50W–33L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Francine Lippiett
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Gerry Hall
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurie White
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pat Conti
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ralph Kozak
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rich Raspet
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susie Morgan
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.