Teams

Downing/18s/4.0/SC Day

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LeDoux/18s/4.0/PAC Day62281230285
2Ethridge/18s/4.0/FAC Day53251535293
3Downing/18s/4.0/SC Day1773371456

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Cherie Pausina
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Daysi Valencia
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.35
Christine Vincent
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.35
Carolyn Chassee
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Caroline France
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.97
Barrie Hidalgo
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Janel Gray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Seeger
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Kelly Slimming
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Monique Thornton
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Stephanie Rolling
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Vonda Downing
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Pausina + Stephanie Rolling4254% gamesnot enough data
Daysi Valencia + Kelly Slimming404 matchesnot enough data
Vonda Downing + Cherie Pausina213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Seeger + Christine Vincent033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cherie Pausina
16W–19L career · 21 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
3.5
Daysi Valencia
61W–15L career · 43 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Christine Vincent
9W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Chassee
20W–6L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Caroline France
18W–17L career · 22 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Barrie Hidalgo
1W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Janel Gray
2W–14L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Seeger
9W–9L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
47W–42L career · 47 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monique Thornton
4W–11L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Rolling
24W–16L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vonda Downing
7W–11L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.