Teams

Arborwood Gentleman

2021 LeeCharlotte Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 W Wednesday Eve

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-25Split 11
L#2 DoublesCynthia Sabatino / Linda Blackmon vs Denise Hanna / Gwendolyn Berestecki7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Giebner / Betty Lasky vs Joan Lake / Joy Dickey6-2, 6-2
2021-06-09vs Unlimited ShotwellLost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Sabatino / Linda Blackmon vs Patricia Duquette / Kim Shotwell4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDiane Giebner / Betty Lasky vs Dana Meyer / Chris Brandt2-6, 4-6
2021-05-26vs Vivante ChandlerLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Blackmon / Betty Lasky vs Sandy Ritter / Susan Theriault1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-05-19vs Cypress Lake FiorilloLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Lukas / Cynthia Sabatino vs Julia Donaldson / Amy Marinell4-6, 6-7
2021-05-12vs Gateway BrooksWon 10
W#3 DoublesVickie Resor / Betty Lasky vs Amanda Pearson / Peggy Martin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-28vs Heritage Palms StevensLost 01
L#2 DoublesBetty Lasky / Vickie Resor vs Denise Hanna / Sherri Campbell7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-21vs Vivante ChandlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesTheresa Cary / Linda Blackmon vs Ann Pfister-Brown / Renee Murno1-6, 2-6
2021-04-14vs Cypress Lake FiorilloLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetty Lasky / Cynthia Sabatino vs Sue Dupont / Marilyn Kole2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Wednesday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Theresa Cary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Cynthia Sabatino
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.16
Denise Weisinger
published 3.5
3.06
Linda Blackmon
published
3.02
Cynthia Gentleman
published 3.5
2.77
Betty Lasky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Tina Owenby
published
Vickie Resor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Gentleman + Denise Weisinger044 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Sabatino + Denise Weisinger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Theresa Cary
67W–78L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Cynthia Sabatino
130W–89L career · 4 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Denise Weisinger
14W–14L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
Linda Blackmon
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Cynthia Gentleman
2W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Betty Lasky
23W–71L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Tina Owenby
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vickie Resor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.