Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW7.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Gretchen Moore
published 4
Deborah Rubnitz
published 4
3.68
Vivian Gabel
published
3.65
Donna Blyshak
published 4
3.63
Joni Bartlett
published
3.63
Patama Suvarnarat
published
3.63
Hilary Butler
published 4
3.37
Elaine Roe
published 3.5
3.34
Denise Hall
published 3.5
3.34
Susan Edwards
published
3.33
Christine Fronczak
published 3.5
3.29
3.25
Cathleen Ligman
published 3.5
3.20
Elizabeth Shaw
published 3.5
3.19
Kay Yonemoto
published
3.18
Carol Giraudo
published 3.5
3.16
Karen Kitagawa
published
3.15
Hang O'Neill
published 3.5
3.10
Kerry Rothschild
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Yonemoto + Carol Giraudo4947% games+2.3% vs expected
Donna Blyshak + Vivian Gabel5455% games+0.8% vs expected
Hang O'Neill + Hilary Butler1440% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Roe + Karen Kitagawa314 matchesnot enough data
Christine Fronczak + Carol Giraudo033 matchesnot enough data
Christine Fronczak + Susan Edwards303 matchesnot enough data
Catharine Hershey-Lin + Karen Kitagawa123 matchesnot enough data
Catharine Hershey-Lin + Kerry Rothschild123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gretchen Moore
24W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Deborah Rubnitz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vivian Gabel
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Donna Blyshak
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Joni Bartlett
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Patama Suvarnarat
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Hilary Butler
15W–21L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Elaine Roe
21W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Denise Hall
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Susan Edwards
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Christine Fronczak
50W–39L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Catharine Hershey-Lin
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Cathleen Ligman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Elizabeth Shaw
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Kay Yonemoto
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Carol Giraudo
7W–25L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Karen Kitagawa
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Hang O'Neill
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Kerry Rothschild
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.