← Teams

VTC-Jones

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Sarah Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Nenette Olson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Hong Allen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.52
Katrina Phillips
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.16
Annie Sumpter
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Results16 ties
2023-09-23Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesRobin Burak / Nenette Olson vs Janice Leitner / Valaurie Caprez7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-09-22Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Joy Nunn vs Rene Ketchum / Deborah Sargeant6-4, 6-3
2023-09-21Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesNenette Olson / Joy Nunn vs Wendy Ellison / Sue Thompson6-0, 6-2
2023-06-24Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesPamela Lagielski / Annie Sumpter vs Diana Chan / Vicki Moll2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-23Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Maryann Velez vs Karen Fossum / Julie Monson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-18Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Robin Burak vs Betty Trubo / Mary Beth Thomsen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-25Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAnnie Sumpter / Hong Allen vs Michaela Bancud / Nikki Metcalf6-1, 6-1
2023-03-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTina Clancy / Sarah Kaufman vs Katherine Kralj / Tami McAra6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnnie Sumpter / Hong Allen vs Cathryn Hansen / Kari Martin6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKatrina Phillips vs Crystal Bryant6-3, 6-4
2023-03-04Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesLori Middleton / Nenette Olson vs Mary Hlady / Toni Kidd6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatrina Phillips vs Kristen Fisher6-2, 6-1
2023-02-25Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Sarah Kaufman vs Kathryn Stockbower / Hillary Ostlund6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCindy Rushall vs Morgan Sugar-BUtter6-1, 6-2
2023-02-04Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Natalya Ramras vs Akemi Okusada / Ren Toshié Miura6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSamantha Williams / Sarah Kaufman vs Claire Thayer / Dalika Crawford6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-29Lost 0–3
L#2 DoublesNenette Olson / Sarah Kaufman vs Amy Bucher / Cassia Carpio6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKatrina Phillips vs Patricia Board6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTina Clancy / Cindy Rushall vs Chanon Ogden / Kana Wakamatsu3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-14Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesCindy Rushall / Natalya Ramras vs Molly Shum / Kaelin Teo6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSamantha Williams / Annie Sumpter vs Kristie Leake / Diane Pittmon6-2, 6-1
2023-01-07Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Naomi Steinberg vs Carrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnnie Sumpter / Hong Allen vs Ellen Bowman / Kathleen Budnick7-6, 6-3
2022-12-04Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMisty Bettis / Nenette Olson vs Pamela Buckley / Lori D'Antonio5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-12-03Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Maryann Velez vs Karen Pickering / Michele Beaman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Sarah Kaufman
31W–12L career
not enough data
—
4
Nenette Olson
122W–164L career
2%98%0%
3.71
3.5
Hong Allen
39W–50L career
0%58%42%
3.58
4
Katrina Phillips
35W–40L career · type A
30%70%0%
3.52
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Annie Sumpter
22W–43L career
6%94%0%
3.16

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.