Teams

WC GREEN

2024 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TRIO

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-05-04vs WP YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeff Milanovich / David Moreno vs Jeffrey Merman / Mark Anderson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIsaac Herman / Whitney Schrandt vs John Davis / Greg Allen6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-06vs HV REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Hines / Isaac Herman vs Tom Horne / Sean Quintana3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Burton vs Peter Dawson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-03-30vs CM BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesCary Huang / Whitney Schrandt vs Joseph Mullen / Paul Tighe4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDan Lyons vs Steven Tamez1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIsaac Herman / Jeffrey Burton vs David Goetz / Patrick Kehoe5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
David Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cary Huang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Dan Lyons
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
David Markenson
published 3
2.69
Jeffrey Burton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.69
Michael Hines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Whitney Schrandt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Jeff Milanovich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Isaac Herman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Moreno + Cary Huang8559% games+4.2% vs expected
Dan Lyons + Cary Huang4251% games+1.5% vs expected
David Moreno + Dan Lyons3450% games−2.6% vs expected
Jeff Milanovich + Whitney Schrandt1834% games−7.0% vs expected
Isaac Herman + Whitney Schrandt224 matchesnot enough data
Isaac Herman + Jeffrey Burton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Moreno
65W–39L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Cary Huang
30W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Dan Lyons
49W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
David Markenson
1W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffrey Burton
47W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Michael Hines
11W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Whitney Schrandt
27W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jeff Milanovich
7W–51L career · 1 line in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.42
2.5
Isaac Herman
25W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%78%22%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.