Teams

Longing/Conway/CTC

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-31vs MKiker/Traskwood/RebWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Squire / Rebecca Kinworthy vs Cornelia Lea / Kori Gordon6-2, 6-4
2023-05-24vs Steel/LR/RebWon 10
W#2 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Martha Blodgett6-0, 6-3
2023-05-21vs Bryant/LR/CCLRLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Kinworthy / Amanda Crowley vs Michele Brewer / Colleen Youngdahl5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-17vs Rodriguez/Harrison/Sherwood/RebLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Crowley / Rebecca Kinworthy vs Dana Rodriguez / Andrea Sellew6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-15vs Steel/LR/RebWon 10
W#2 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Tish Pace6-1, 6-1
2023-05-06Won 10
W#2 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Lynn Stone6-0, 6-0
2023-05-03vs Rodriguez/Harrison/Sherwood/RebLost 01
L#1 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Jacquelyn Harrison2-6, 2-6
2023-04-24vs MKiker/Traskwood/RebWon 10
W#2 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs JoAnne Wooldridge6-1, 6-0
2023-04-20vs DGarretson/LR/BPWon 10
W#2 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Allani Preston6-3, 6-0
2023-04-12vs Bryant/LR/CCLRWon 10
W#2 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Eden Raines6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Hannah Heffernan
published
3.71
Jessica Underwood
published
3.69
Rebecca Kinworthy
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.63
Megan Longing
published
3.62
Amanda Crowley
published 4
3.55
Whitney Cathcart
published
3.37
Hannah Howell
published
Anna Squire
published 3.5
3.19
Robin Frazier
published
Jordan Ryals
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Frazier + Hannah Howell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Heffernan
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Jessica Underwood
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Rebecca Kinworthy
146W–99L career · 10 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Megan Longing
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Amanda Crowley
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Whitney Cathcart
11W–20L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Hannah Howell
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Anna Squire
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Frazier
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Jordan Ryals
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.