Teams

MARIN TC 40AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-02vs BELVEDERE TC 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Boorse / Doke Kim vs Andrew Glickman / Christopher Sheldon4-6, 1-6
2025-02-08vs MILL VALLEY 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDerek Boorse / Greg Friedman vs Patrick Ryan / Patrick Yaeger1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-01-30vs BELVEDERE TC 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Boorse / Doke Kim vs Andrew Glickman / James Redfern2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-18vs HARBOR PT 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesDerek Boorse vs Paul Navazio2-6, 2-6
2025-01-12vs SCOTT VALLEY 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDerek Boorse / David Shepard vs Mark Downing / Chad Williams6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
David Sadoff
published 4
3.62
Tassos Papadimos
published
3.50
Elliott Magnuson
published
3.48
Steve Juliani
published
3.47
Doke Kim
published
3.39
Greg Friedman
published
3.39
Jeff Loebbaka
published
3.37
Joseph Gil
published
3.34
Derek Boorse
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.31
David Shepard
published 3.5
3.25
Mark Clem
published
3.18
Rob Cochran
published
3.18
Stacy Nimmo
published
3.10
Andrew Fremier
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elliott Magnuson + Jeff Loebbaka3356% gamesnot enough data
Elliott Magnuson + Mark Clem213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Sadoff
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Tassos Papadimos
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
Elliott Magnuson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Steve Juliani
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Doke Kim
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
Greg Friedman
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Jeff Loebbaka
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Joseph Gil
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
4
Derek Boorse
137W–176L career · 5 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
David Shepard
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Mark Clem
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Rob Cochran
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Stacy Nimmo
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Andrew Fremier
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.