Teams

Venable/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-16vs Childs/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesWendi Miller / Rene Fields vs Ginger Childs / Amanda Han6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJenifer Lodge vs Paige Sparacino4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSonja Plumlee / Liz Grabarits vs Kelly Cole / Debora Edkin3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Santos / Teresa Hamilton vs Christina Odom / Stephanie Buhalis7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesBeth Burns / Sheryl Carmack vs Jenny Stoebner / Stacy Perry7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-28vs Hambidge/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesTeresa Hamilton / Mary Beth Tabor vs Cristin Hambidge / Nicole Babu2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJulie Pieper Hemmings vs Katie Ouellette1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRene Fields / Liz Grabarits vs Lissa Jarnigan / Kate Tharp6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Venable / Wendi Miller vs Melinda Senna / Kristin Merrill6-3, 6-0
W#4 DoublesCorinne Perry / Lisa Evans vs Katherine Church / Kari Cabale7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Liz Grabarits
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Wendi Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Corinne Perry
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Julie Pieper Hemmings
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Rene Fields
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Mary Beth Tabor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Sonja Plumlee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
April Penny
published 3.5
3.04
Jenifer Lodge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Sheryl Carmack
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Venable
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Santos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendi Miller + Kim Venable213 matchesnot enough data
Sonja Plumlee + Liz Grabarits213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz Grabarits
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Wendi Miller
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Corinne Perry
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julie Pieper Hemmings
2W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.24
Rene Fields
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Mary Beth Tabor
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Sonja Plumlee
13W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
April Penny
3W–17L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Jenifer Lodge
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Sheryl Carmack
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Kim Venable
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Santos
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.