Teams

AR 8.5M 40 & Over (Mesaris)

2025 Combo 40 & Over 6.5, 8.5 · 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-09vs Bobbitt/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesLee Mesaris / Jason Sykes vs Kyle Garretson / Jeff Harrington6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoseph Gilliam / Taylor Condrey vs Gary Jones / Keith Montgomery6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBritt Loyd / Roger Meredith vs Dave Bobbitt / Adam Zimmerman0-1
2025-11-09vs Bobbitt/LR/RebWon 21
L#1 DoublesBritt Loyd / Will Aguilar vs Dave Bobbitt / Jack Lankford4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarl Bell / Taylor Condrey vs Adam Zimmerman / Keith Montgomery6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoseph Gilliam / Jon Erie vs Kyle Garretson / Jeff Harrington6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-08vs Bobbitt/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoseph Gilliam / Jonathan Johnson vs Gary Jones / Keith Montgomery6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJay Heflin / Jason Sykes vs Adam Zimmerman / Jeff Harrington6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBritt Loyd / Terry Ames vs Kyle Garretson / Dave Bobbitt4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AR 8.5M 40 & Over (Mesaris)3063765
2Bobbitt/LR/Reb03361280

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Jay Heflin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carl Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Joseph Gilliam
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.20
Jonathan Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Britt Loyd
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Lee Mesaris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Jason Sykes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Will Aguilar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jon Erie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Taylor Condrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roger Meredith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Ames
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Sykes + Taylor Condrey1444% games+6.8% vs expected
Jason Sykes + Will Aguilar3257% games−5.3% vs expected
Jonathan Johnson + Terry Ames213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Heflin
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Carl Bell
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Gilliam
22W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
4.24
Jonathan Johnson
23W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Britt Loyd
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
Lee Mesaris
34W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.15
Jason Sykes
39W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Will Aguilar
46W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Jon Erie
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Taylor Condrey
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Roger Meredith
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Terry Ames
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.