Teams

Different Strokes

2025 Prince Georges Combo · Prince Georges Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-09vs Serving YouLost 01
L#2 DoublesDenese Cavanaugh / Venita Cooper vs Deborah Thompson / Deana Stamper2-6, 1-6
2025-11-02vs Combo RacqsWon 10
W#3 DoublesTammara Peyton / Alexis Cooke vs Amber Surmiller / Calle Cone6-0, 6-2
2025-10-25vs Get A GripLost 02
L#1 DoublesDenese Cavanaugh / Katina Linkins vs Gay Trinkner / TingTing Du2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTammara Peyton / Lisa Rainey vs Tracy Walls / Claudia Guardia6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Serving YouLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Johnson / Jamescha Johnson vs Kimberly Walker / Ann-Lee Chen3-6, 4-6
2025-09-28vs Combo RacqsWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlecia Brinkley / Brenda Gibbs vs Yngrid Sierra / Calle Cone6-4, 6-1
2025-09-28vs Get A GripLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenese Cavanaugh / Katina Linkins vs Claris Brock / Annette James3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Tammara Peyton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Beth Turner
published 3.5
3.25
Takeysha Robinson
published
3.08
Marsha Williams
published
3.06
Alecia Brinkley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Jamescha Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Denese Cavanaugh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alexis Cooke
published 3
2.74
Brenda Gibbs
published 3
2.68
Venita Cooper
published
2.60
Stephanie Marshall
published
2.58
Katina Linkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Venita Cooper + Stephanie Marshall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tammara Peyton
37W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
3.5
Beth Turner
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Takeysha Robinson
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Marsha Williams
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Alecia Brinkley
145W–181L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Jamescha Johnson
58W–67L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Denese Cavanaugh
147W–104L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Alexis Cooke
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brenda Gibbs
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Venita Cooper
19W–22L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Stephanie Marshall
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Katina Linkins
48W–124L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.