Teams

Old Westwood Whackers - Payne

2025 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-17vs Salisbury-RiegelWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharles Wayland / Greg Robinson vs Michael Miller / John Barnes6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWilliam Pilc / Bryan Carr vs James Chicklo / John Spichiger6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJames Faulstich / Harry Turton vs Jeff Brown / Bruce Lane6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Kevin Whitlock
published
4.03
Charles Wayland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Gil Elmaleh
published
3.80
Brewster Brown
published 4
3.78
Charles Stafford
published 4
3.75
William Pilc
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Bryan Carr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Frank Payne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Chris Gilman
published 3.5
3.32
George Brickley
published
3.25
Harry Turton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
James Faulstich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Dave Mulholland
published 3.5
2.78
Robert Paullin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Greg Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brewster Brown + Charles Stafford314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Whitlock
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Charles Wayland
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Gil Elmaleh
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Brewster Brown
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Charles Stafford
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
William Pilc
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Bryan Carr
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Frank Payne
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Chris Gilman
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
George Brickley
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Harry Turton
16W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
James Faulstich
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Dave Mulholland
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Robert Paullin
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
Greg Robinson
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.