Teams

BC-Peninsula/PattiYork3.5

2026 SoCal Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · BC Women - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-WestEnd/BrendaKodani3.5000000
2BC-MiraCosta/ElizabethPark3.5000000
3BC-AltaVista/KarieLanterman3.5000000
4BC-SouthEnd/KathyKim3.5000000
5BC-BillieJeanKing/BeejellSoco3.5000000
6BC-PVTC/TriciaRapaport3.5000000
7BC-MCC/AmySchmargen3.5000000
8BC-MCC/KristieSherrill3.5000000
9BC-ElSegundo/SusanMoreno3.5000000
10BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartini3.5000000
11BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolff3.5000000
12BC-Kramer/ColleenPost3.5000000
13BC-MCC/LesleyLyon3.5000000
14BC-Peninsula/PattiYork3.5000000
15BC-WestEnd/TakakoTary3.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Ru Bai
published
3.33
TINA ZIMMER
published
3.33
Adeline Hui-Bon-Hoa
published 3.5
3.31
Yolanda Williams
published
3.26
Maki Jerden
published
3.25
Jennifer Lee Loy
published
3.24
Prama Bhatt
published
3.23
Ailin Li-Silverman
published 3.5
3.08
Sonomi Deguchi
published
3.07
Maureen Takahashi
published
3.05
Fanita Kuljis
published 3.5
3.05
Liza Ko
published
2.99
Claudina Mercado
published 3
2.97
2.96
Mary Ann Foard
published
2.95
Alina Mikolaitis
published 3
2.75
Laura Malandrino
published
Jenny Forsyth
published
Sara Butler
published
Tess Hechmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TINA ZIMMER + Jennifer Lee Loy4160% gamesnot enough data
Prama Bhatt + Maki Jerden2342% gamesnot enough data
Fanita Kuljis + Claudina Mercado033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Foard + Liza Ko213 matchesnot enough data
Ru Bai + Laura Malandrino213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ru Bai
11W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
TINA ZIMMER
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Adeline Hui-Bon-Hoa
20W–15L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Yolanda Williams
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Maki Jerden
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Jennifer Lee Loy
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Prama Bhatt
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Ailin Li-Silverman
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Sonomi Deguchi
2W–16L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Maureen Takahashi
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Fanita Kuljis
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Evangeline Roxas-Butlig
49W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
Liza Ko
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Claudina Mercado
27W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Patricia Guerra York
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Mary Ann Foard
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
3
Alina Mikolaitis
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Laura Malandrino
15W–12L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Jenny Forsyth
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Butler
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tess Hechmer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.