Teams

DThayaprasat (Queens)

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 10.0 - Tues PM

13 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-23vs BSimpson (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRyan MacY / Kindell Schmitt vs Luke Laney / Toni Laney6-3, 6-2
2025-07-15vs BSimpson (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Christian Hess vs Carson Rose Tennyson / Depei Yu6-3, 6-1
2025-06-24vs BSimpson (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Brett Landau vs Carson Rose Tennyson / Depei Yu2-6, 6-4
2025-06-17vs BSimpson (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Christian Hess vs Samantha Danesis / Luke Laney6-4, 6-1
2025-06-10vs BSimpson (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Carlos Nolasco Moreno vs Ross Edgar / Samantha Danesis1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 10.0 - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.29
4.96
Christian Hess
published 5
4.88
Sam Dean
published
4.84
Sarah Cimmino
published
4.63
Kindell Schmitt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.48
Peter Tonon
published
4.42
Darri Thayaprasat
published 4.5
4.25
Mary McGehee
published
Ryan MacY
published
Sanjana Sudhir
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan MacY + Annabella Bonadonna Ayala303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Annabella Bonadonna Ayala
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
5.29
5
Christian Hess
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.96
Sam Dean
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.88
Sarah Cimmino
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.84
5
Carlos Nolasco Moreno
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Christiaan Lee-Daigle
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Kindell Schmitt
118W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.63
Peter Tonon
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
4.48
4.5
Darri Thayaprasat
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
Hannah English Rahill
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
4.25
Mary McGehee
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan MacY
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sanjana Sudhir
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.