Teams

MWittke

2022 Cap Spring USTA 65 & over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-27vs KSerow65-3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Carroll / Suzanne Turnburke vs Diane Schroeder / Alice Snell6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJean Williams / Ann Ashburn vs Carol Zimmerman / Carol Vervaert6-4, 7-5
2022-04-20vs MHerlihySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnn Ashburn / Linda Carroll vs Deborah Brazee / Martha Herlihy6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Sweitzer / Margo Grant vs Peggy Dobbins / Kim Gottshall2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-13vs LArchambaultLost 02
L#1 DoublesMargo Grant / Suzanne Turnburke vs Beverly Rubin / Debbie Hildebran0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Robison / Ann Ashburn vs Linda Heidgerd / Delores Bluestone2-6, 1-6
2022-04-06vs KSerow65-3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Carroll / Suzanne Turnburke vs QUEEN HARGROVE / Barbara Howe4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-03-23vs LArchambaultLost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Turnburke / Linda Carroll vs Paula Hale / Beverly Rubin4-6, 3-6
2022-03-22vs MHerlihySplit 11
L#2 DoublesGinger Sidoti / Cheryl Sweitzer vs Leslie Mahan / Mitzi Ellis6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Ashburn / Jean Williams vs Martha Herlihy / Liza Gettles6-2, 6-3
2022-03-16vs KSerow65-3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret Wittke / Suzanne Turnburke vs Bonnie Giles / Barbara Howe6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Sweitzer / Ginger Sidoti vs Debra Allen / Kathleen Serow6-1, 6-3
2022-03-02vs LArchambaultLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Ashburn / Jean Williams vs Debbie Hildebran / Beverly Rubin5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
CARLA FIELDS
published 3.5
3.24
Linda Carroll
published
3.17
Margo Grant
published
3.05
Jean Williams
published
2.79
Suzanne Turnburke
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Cheryl Sweitzer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Ann Ashburn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
CARLA FIELDS
14W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Linda Carroll
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Margo Grant
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Jean Williams
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Suzanne Turnburke
62W–96L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Cheryl Sweitzer
57W–118L career · 3 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Ann Ashburn
19W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.