Teams

TDC Carlyle

2022 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-11vs Raintree Bryan / Bullard 7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesDeborah Eldridge / Alice Ulrichs vs Molly Smith / Pam Koch3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Schultz / Robin Zachwieja vs Kim Earle / Marcia Finsterwald6-1, 6-0
2022-08-09vs ACAC LindermanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMargaret Duke / Nancy Mihalko vs Sandra Holahan / Dawn MacHonis6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Deborah Eldridge vs Ann Yates / Donna Barrett6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSheri Carlyle / Kim Schultz vs Crystal Hull / Alicia Barnett6-0, 6-3
2022-08-02vs Burkwood ClarkWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Margaret Duke vs Kimberley Winn / Mary Allen6-2, 4-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Sheri Carlyle vs Modestine Carter / Cynthia Dunivan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRhonda Underwood / Deborah Eldridge vs Carolyn Shute / Laura Ganzert6-3, 6-1
2022-07-18vs Westwood - Payne / HassettWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Margaret Duke vs Cheryl Loden / Barbara Hassett6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Dull / Kim Schultz vs Donna Bearman / Caren Payne0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-14vs ACAC LarueLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Alice Ulrichs vs Monte Shorte / Susan Lockhart5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Schultz / Betsy Siewers vs Kathryn Williams / Denise Weisberg2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRhonda Underwood / Brenda Ackerman vs Virginia Nelson / Maureen Sisti6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-20vs TCRC SchweitzerWon 10
W#2 DoublesSheri Carlyle / Rhonda Underwood vs Michele Asher / Jeannie Wyant6-1, 6-4
2022-06-13vs RMC FlowersWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Margaret Duke vs Kathy Flowers / Donna Mourtzakis6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Deborah Eldridge vs Amy Scherer / Rhonda McIlwain6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobin Zachwieja / Kim Schultz vs Brenda Tyson / Mona Stahling7-6, 7-6
2022-06-06vs Burkwood SweeneySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Dull / Alice Ulrichs vs Catherine Sweeney / Cynthia Muncy6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSheri Carlyle / Kim Schultz vs Frances Poehler / Lisa Mallory6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Nancy Mihalko
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Rhonda Underwood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Diana Dull
published 3.5
3.26
Alice Ulrichs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Deborah Eldridge
published 3.5
Brenda Ackerman
published 3.5
3.23
Betsy Siewers
published 3.5
3.14
Kim Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Sheri Carlyle
published
3.08
Margaret Duke
published
2.68
Robin Zachwieja
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Mihalko + Kim Schultz7847% games−8.1% vs expected
Nancy Mihalko + Alice Ulrichs303 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Eldridge + Rhonda Underwood123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nancy Mihalko
182W–109L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Rhonda Underwood
96W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Diana Dull
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Alice Ulrichs
86W–77L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Deborah Eldridge
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Brenda Ackerman
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Siewers
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Kim Schultz
75W–79L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Sheri Carlyle
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Margaret Duke
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Robin Zachwieja
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.