Teams

BOND / NGUYEN

2026 SETX 18 & Over Mixed · 8.0 MIX

14 players · average NTRP 4.10 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-06vs The Underdogs!Won 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Bond / Sarah Jabbia vs Joshua Williams / Hazel Mistry6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAaron Ruppel / Shanita MacEda vs Gary Cobb / Jennifer Fisher2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Lara Gugel / Rayleigh Duplechin vs Daniel White / April Fox6-2, 6-2
2026-07-30vs The Underdogs!Won 30
W#1 DoublesAlejandro Lara Gugel / Rayleigh Duplechin vs Joshua Williams / Hazel Mistry6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMeghan Nguyen / Justin Kelly vs Jennifer Fisher / Gary Cobb6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCheyenne Williams / Madison Bond vs Daniel White / Wendy Nobles6-1, 6-0
2026-07-23vs The Underdogs!Won 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Duplechin / Rayleigh Duplechin vs Dalton Broussard / April Fox7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohanna Liska-Wilson / Justin Kelly vs Daniel White / Wendy Nobles6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Lara Gugel / Shanita MacEda vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-16vs The Underdogs!Won 20
W#2 DoublesCheyenne Williams / Daniel Duplechin vs Blake Busceme / April Fox6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAaron Ruppel / Meghan Nguyen vs Wendy Nobles / Ronald Nobles6-1, 6-1
2026-07-09vs The Underdogs!Won 20
W#1 DoublesDaniel Duplechin / Sarah Jabbia vs Blake Busceme / Skylar Murphy6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJosh Daniels / Michelle Marroquin vs Daniel White / Wendy Nobles6-1, 6-1
2026-07-02vs The Underdogs!Won 30
W#1 DoublesMeghan Nguyen / Brent Ritchey vs Wendy Nobles / Ronald Nobles6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDaniel Duplechin / Shanita MacEda vs Patrick Pearson / Julie Evanko7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohanna Liska-Wilson / Josh Daniels vs Dalton Broussard / Skylar Murphy6-3, 7-5
2026-06-25vs The Underdogs!Won 30
W#1 DoublesCheyenne Williams / Daniel Duplechin vs Jennifer Fisher / Dalton Broussard6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohanna Liska-Wilson / Madison Bond vs Joshua Williams / Hazel Mistry6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Jabbia / Aaron Ruppel vs Gary Cobb / Michelle Foxworth6-3, 6-4
2026-06-18vs The Underdogs!Won 20
W#2 DoublesAaron Ruppel / Sarah Jabbia vs Daniel White / Julie Evanko1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrent Ritchey / Michelle Marroquin vs Hazel Mistry / Joshua Williams6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 MIX
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BOND / NGUYEN802402100
2The Underdogs!0802448285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Daniel Duplechin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.34
Alejandro Lara Gugel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Josh Daniels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Brent Ritchey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.94
Justin Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.78
Aaron Ruppel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Madison Bond
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.43
Cheyenne Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Johanna Liska-Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Justin Lu
published
Meghan Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Marroquin
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sarah Jabbia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Shanita MacEda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheyenne Williams + Daniel Duplechin7077% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Marroquin + Josh Daniels4361% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Jabbia + Aaron Ruppel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Duplechin
27W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Alejandro Lara Gugel
28W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
4.34
Josh Daniels
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Brent Ritchey
19W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
Justin Kelly
16W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.94
4
Aaron Ruppel
17W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
Madison Bond
22W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Cheyenne Williams
23W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Johanna Liska-Wilson
27W–5L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Justin Lu
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Meghan Nguyen
33W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Marroquin
16W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Jabbia
10W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shanita MacEda
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.