Teams

Kilauea Heat

2025 Adult 18 and Over League · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-14vs Screamin' ChickensLost 01
L#1 DoublesJolanta Kiepas / Grace Nguyen vs Cindy Lam / Susan Fazekas3-6, 3-6
2025-05-31vs Screamin' ChickensWon 10
W#1 DoublesAni Dinkova / Rita Wang vs Biljana Baker / Cindy Lam7-5, 6-4
2025-05-24vs Screamin' ChickensSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAni Dinkova / Emily Humber vs Tracey Lyum / Shina Degucci6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMahiely Garcia / Rita Wang vs Taieya Kihe / Yola Monakhov Stockton0-6, 0-6
2025-05-10vs Screamin' ChickensLost 03
L#1 DoublesRita Wang / Ani Dinkova vs Taieya Kihe / Cindy Lam6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJolanta Kiepas vs Biljana Baker7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Humber / Grace Nguyen vs Shina Degucci / Tiffanie Masutani4-6, 4-6
2025-05-03vs Screamin' ChickensWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Humber / Ani Dinkova vs Shina Degucci / Cindy Lam7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-12vs Screamin' ChickensSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGrace Nguyen / Emily Humber vs Shina Degucci / Susan Fazekas4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRita Wang vs Lori Sun6-1, 6-0
2025-04-05vs Screamin' ChickensLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Humber / Rita Wang vs Taieya Kihe / Tiffanie Masutani1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMahiely Garcia / Jolanta Kiepas vs Cindy Lam / Yola Monakhov Stockton1-6, 1-6
2025-03-29vs Screamin' ChickensLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarian Lee / Grace Nguyen vs Taieya Kihe / Shina Degucci1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Humber vs Tiffanie Masutani7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAni Dinkova / Erikka Chambers vs Yola Monakhov Stockton / Biljana Baker4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Screamin' Chickens7115921179
2Kilauea Heat1781635244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Madeleine Dreith
published 4
2.51
Ani Dinkova
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.44
Rita Wang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.11
Emily Humber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.98
Jolanta Kiepas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Marian Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Madeleine Dreith
58W–40L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
3
Ani Dinkova
14W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Rita Wang
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
Emily Humber
7W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jolanta Kiepas
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Marian Lee
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.