Teams

Ch.Kopp40C

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-01vs Mi.Spangenberg40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesMandi Chappell / Sarah Maynard vs Amy Kell / Linda Chuang6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-24vs Yv.Barrow40C6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesMandi Chappell / Amy Robinson vs April Taylor / Allison Glenn7-5, 6-0
2025-09-23vs Ma.LaPlante40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesMandi Chappell / Crystal Smith vs Susanne Knowles / Laura Bell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-03vs Ma.Slaymaker40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMandi Chappell / Crystal Smith vs Summer DuMont / Katherine Canavan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Maynard / Emy Hanson vs Leslie Wright / Rebekah Mcconnell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-08-27vs Ch.Burr40CLost 02
L#2 DoublesCrystal Smith / Emy Hanson vs Heather Roberts / Hope Graney6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMandi Chappell / Amy Robinson vs Terry Perrone / Julie Liddle0-6, 3-6
2025-08-20vs Pa.Cochran40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmy Hanson / Sarah Maynard vs Paula Cochran / Mary Ann Enzweiler6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Melissa Graham
published
3.29
Brooke Abee
published 3.5
3.18
Crystal Smith
published 3.5
3.07
Ramsay Younger
published
3.04
Stephanie Simpson
published
2.96
Emy Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
2.81
Mandi Chappell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Charlotte Kopp
published 3
2.49
Lisa Pace
published
Jerri Lemanski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramsay Younger + Emy Hanson4352% games+5.8% vs expected
Stephanie Simpson + Charlotte Kopp123 matchesnot enough data
Mandi Chappell + Emy Hanson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Graham
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Brooke Abee
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Crystal Smith
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Ramsay Younger
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Stephanie Simpson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Emy Hanson
65W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Inma Navarro Galisteo
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Mandi Chappell
65W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Charlotte Kopp
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67
Lisa Pace
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Jerri Lemanski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.