Teams

Leftwich / Upper Cumberland

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Upper Cumb. · 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-06vs Allen / Upper CumberlandLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelinda Leftwich / Brady Goodman vs Marcie Allen / Ric Fagan2-8
L#2 DoublesBrinna Spaetgens / Daniel Perez vs Christi Mueller / Joo Hun Lee2-8
L#3 DoublesKatharine Grosklaus / Conner Scott vs Maren Bader / James Wallace3-8
2025-08-05vs Allen / Upper CumberlandLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrinna Spaetgens / Daniel Perez vs Marcie Allen / Brian Challenger5-8
L#2 DoublesKatharine Grosklaus / Dennis Padiernos vs Christi Mueller / Joo Hun Lee1-8
L#3 DoublesMelinda Leftwich / Conner Scott vs Cinthya Gonzalez / Ric Fagan8-9
2025-08-04vs Allen / Upper CumberlandLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrinna Spaetgens / Conner Scott vs Marcie Allen / Ric Fagan4-8
L#2 DoublesDennis Padiernos / Joanne Berina vs Renee Henry / Brian Challenger2-8
L#3 DoublesKatharine Grosklaus / Brady Goodman vs Christina Prine / James Wallace4-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Leftwich / Upper Cumberland0309973

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brady Goodman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Brinna Spaetgens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Conner Scott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dennis Padiernos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Joanne Berina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katharine Grosklaus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melinda Leftwich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brady Goodman
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brinna Spaetgens
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Conner Scott
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dennis Padiernos
0W–2L career · type T · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joanne Berina
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katharine Grosklaus
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melinda Leftwich
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.