Teams

McKenzie

2026 Sequoyah Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over - Christmas Tourn · 18 & Over Mens 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-07vs GA 3.5-2.5M 18 & Over (Chastain)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHayden Childre / Edward Jones vs Chris Smith / Jackson Norris1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBilly Bowers / Donald Groseclose vs Lee Holder / Robbie Armstrong6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJorge Torres / Matt Henderson vs Hector Chiessa / Peyton Chastain3-6, 3-6
2025-12-07vs GA 3.5-2.5M 18 & Over (Chastain)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLuke Mckenzie / Hayden Childre vs Jordan Wells / Timothy Malone7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBilly Bowers / Jonathon Nesbitt vs Scott King / Joshua Lawson0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJorge Torres / Matt Henderson vs Peyton Chastain / Bradley Mason0-6, 3-6
2025-12-06vs GA 3.5-2.5M 18 & Over (Chastain)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLuke Mckenzie / Jeff McBrayer vs Ashwin Venkatesu / Chris Smith7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Hullender / Donald Groseclose vs Lee Holder / Robbie Armstrong5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-12-06vs GA 3.5-2.5M 18 & Over (Chastain)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesEdward Jones / Jeff McBrayer vs Jackson Norris / Timothy Malone1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Hullender / Jonathon Nesbitt vs Brian Chastain / David Locke3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJorge Torres / Matt Henderson vs Kyle Gonzalez-lloyd / Bradley Mason1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Mens 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GA 3.5-2.5M 18 & Over (Chastain)31102671
2McKenzie1321021138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Luke Mckenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Hayden Childre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Billy Bowers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Donald Groseclose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Jeff McBrayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Jonathon Nesbitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Michael Hullender
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Matt Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Billy Bowers + Donald Groseclose224 matchesnot enough data
Billy Bowers + Jonathon Nesbitt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luke Mckenzie
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.29
Hayden Childre
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3
Billy Bowers
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Donald Groseclose
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
Jeff McBrayer
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%7%93%
2.71
Jonathon Nesbitt
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%52%48%
2.49
Michael Hullender
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Matt Henderson
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.