Teams

Trochimowicz

2025 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-11-15vs HennemanWon 10
W#1 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Christiane Brunner6-3, 6-2
2025-11-09vs McVeighWon 20
W#1 SinglesAllie Hildebrand vs Megan Roberts6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesErin Weller vs Heather Nesti6-1, 6-4
2025-10-22vs DeFrancaWon 20
W#1 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Sabine Balzora6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesEmily Trochimowicz vs Patricia De Franca6-3, 6-0
2025-10-21vs McVeighSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Megan Roberts1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesErin Weller vs Priti Bhansali7-6, 6-2
2025-10-20vs DeFrancaWon 20
W#2 SinglesAllie Hildebrand vs Tamara Thumbtzen6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesErin Weller vs Daniela VanWambeke6-2, 6-2
2025-10-19vs Baldwin 3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Jennifer Baldwin6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesErin Weller vs Giovanna Schummer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-02vs McVeighLost 02
L#1 SinglesAllie Hildebrand vs Erin McVeigh3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesErin Weller vs Priti Bhansali6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-28vs HennemanWon 20
W#1 SinglesAllie Hildebrand vs Julia Wunderlick6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Theresa Coufal6-1, 6-1
2025-09-24Won 10
W#2 SinglesAllie Hildebrand vs Jennifer Baldwin6-1, 6-1
2025-09-20vs DeFrancaWon 20
W#1 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Patricia De Franca6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesErin Weller vs Tracie Hamilton6-0, 6-0
2025-09-08vs HennemanWon 20
W#2 SinglesEmily Trochimowicz vs Theresa Coufal6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Katherine Dunbar6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Allie Hildebrand
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.96
Emily Trochimowicz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.95
Miyeon Jeon
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 14% · published 3
2.85
Erin Weller
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published 3
2.74
Jessica Myers
published
2.71
MADELINE MOORE
published
Kristel Walton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Trochimowicz + Allie Hildebrand123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allie Hildebrand
47W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3
Emily Trochimowicz
103W–112L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Miyeon Jeon
142W–88L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Erin Weller
41W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Jessica Myers
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
MADELINE MOORE
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Kristel Walton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.