Teams

3: Phillips 7.0/LF

2025 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 7.0 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-21vs 4: Whitten 7.0/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesShae Hedrick / Candy Phillips vs Haven Willis / Joanie Bonfield Dinneen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTraci Hazel / Amanda Hardwick vs Vicki Sue Loehrs / Karen Young2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Webster / Tonia Parsons vs Sandra Fraser / Jo Clark7-5, 6-2
2025-05-10vs Wilburn 7.0/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesKema Hicks / Gina Brim vs Jody Fitzgerald / Susie Anderson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShae Hedrick / Candy Phillips vs Patricia Stuart / Tracie Wilson6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTraci Hazel / Nancy Burris vs Janice Wilburn / Susan Hargis6-0, 6-4
2025-04-26vs Shahadi 7.0/TTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffany Steinke / Sharna Bovasso vs Nancy Hicks / Dana Peace6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNancy Burris / Stephanie Pugh vs Nancy Shahadi / Vickie Kelley7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Martin / Amanda Hardwick vs Alyson Langholz / Carey Cole6-2, 6-4
2025-04-12vs Penn 7.0/PHSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNancy Burris / Candy Phillips vs Stephanie Loseke / Christy Barnes6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTonia Parsons / Elizabeth Webster vs Staci Henry / Tina Moody2-6, 5-7
2025-04-05vs TULSA/Duke 7.0/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesCandy Phillips / Shae Hedrick vs Mia Vahlberg / Gloria Mullenix2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSharna Bovasso / Tiffany Steinke vs Shannon Pearson / Lynette Thurman6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNancy Burris / Stephanie Pugh vs Karin Duke / Vanessa Hutto6-7, 4-6
2025-03-29vs Kolman 7.0/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesShae Hedrick / Candy Phillips vs Shari Singleton / Deborah Hale6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTraci Hazel / Amanda Hardwick vs Lisa Seifert / Georgia Burd6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKema Hicks / Gina Brim vs Becky Newport / Stephanie Kolman6-4, 7-6
2025-03-22vs Shadid 7.0/SHWon 20
W#2 DoublesTiffany Steinke / Sharna Bovasso vs Terry Largent / Zahidah Hyman6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCandy Phillips / Traci Hazel vs Laurie Wollmershauser / Diane Wood6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-08vs Harris 7.0/PHLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Doerr / Andrea Martin vs Allison Eve / Pam Meimerstorf3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCandy Phillips / Nancy Burris vs Linda Baugher / Annmarie Wright1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTonia Parsons / Elizabeth Webster vs Cynthia Harp / Kathleen Harris7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 7.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11: Bradshaw 7.0/IS7118615182
2TULSA/Duke 7.0/LF7116819189
33: Phillips 7.0/LF5316821213
44: Whitten 7.0/LF53131125190
5Penn 7.0/PH53121229225
6Harris 7.0/PH44141025214
7Wasserott 7.0/LF44111330235
8Kolman 7.0/LF44101432229
9Shadid 7.0/SH35121231226
10Westfall 7.0/LF2671736238
11Shahadi 7.0/TTC2691537261
12Wilburn 7.0/LF0861839246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Tonia Parsons
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.40
Gina Brim
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Andrea Martin
published 3.5
3.16
Nancy Burris
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Shae Hedrick
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Sharna Bovasso
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Patricia Doerr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Tiffany Steinke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Candy Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.89
Traci Hazel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Kema Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Amanda Hardwick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Webster
published
Stephanie Pugh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharna Bovasso + Tiffany Steinke321060% games+7.7% vs expected
Patricia Doerr + Andrea Martin4451% games+6.7% vs expected
Nancy Burris + Candy Phillips8854% games−3.6% vs expected
Candy Phillips + Shae Hedrick7447% games−6.1% vs expected
Andrea Martin + Stephanie Pugh3252% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Hardwick + Traci Hazel224 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Doerr + Candy Phillips123 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Steinke + Elizabeth Webster123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tonia Parsons
117W–71L career · 8 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Gina Brim
114W–69L career · 5 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Andrea Martin
51W–46L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Burris
112W–79L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Shae Hedrick
118W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Sharna Bovasso
71W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Patricia Doerr
108W–80L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Tiffany Steinke
119W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Candy Phillips
65W–58L career · 7 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Traci Hazel
63W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Kema Hicks
81W–78L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
3.5
Amanda Hardwick
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.46
Elizabeth Webster
38W–38L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Pugh
57W–56L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.