Teams

BH - Langston

2023 B'ham Fall - Adult 55 & Over Women, Weekday 1:30 pm · 3.5 Women - Monday 1:00 pm

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - Monday 1:00 pm have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Linda Tisdale
published
3.34
Brenda Campis
published 3.5
3.31
Melody Debardelaben
published
3.30
Robin Holley
published
3.21
Annemarie Wilson
published 3.5
3.08
Susan Filippini
published
3.07
Linda Hodges
published
3.04
Janice Langston
published
3.04
Joy Fuller
published
3.00
Elizabeth Garner
published 3.5
2.96
Ellen Bernstein
published 3
2.69
Alana Bass
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Holley + Susan Filippini8360% games+3.2% vs expected
Annemarie Wilson + Susan Filippini5747% games−0.2% vs expected
Brenda Campis + Elizabeth Garner2340% games−16.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Tisdale
38W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Brenda Campis
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.34
Melody Debardelaben
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Robin Holley
56W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Annemarie Wilson
24W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Susan Filippini
22W–21L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Linda Hodges
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Janice Langston
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Joy Fuller
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Elizabeth Garner
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Ellen Bernstein
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Alana Bass
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.