Teams

V - Sunset Rizers

2023 SoCal Tri-Level 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesPam Schuberg / Wyne Quinn vs Cindy Baw / Ana Gorman5-7, 1-6
2023-07-22vs V - Mission Oaks Smart AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesWyne Quinn / Heather McGregor vs Deanne Saucerman / Lisa Moran6-2, 6-4
2023-07-15vs V - Sunset Hills Thunder SistersLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Hickey / Wyne Quinn vs Deanna Romero / Elain Cleary0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Heather McGregor
published
3.58
Wyne Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Lynn Hertz
published
3.41
Ina Kim
published
3.38
Janice Pinnell
published
3.24
Kate Centanni
published
3.24
Judy Eisenbrand
published
3.22
Pam Schuberg
published
3.06
Deborah Cassar
published 3.5
3.00
Tanya Thompson
published
2.96
Marie Smith
published
2.85
Nora Valentino
published
Lydia Davila
published
Megan Mathews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Smith + Pam Schuberg4157% games+3.1% vs expected
Janice Pinnell + Ina Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather McGregor
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Wyne Quinn
103W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Lynn Hertz
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
3.41
Janice Pinnell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kate Centanni
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Judy Eisenbrand
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Pam Schuberg
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Deborah Cassar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Tanya Thompson
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Marie Smith
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Nora Valentino
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Lydia Davila
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Mathews
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.