Teams

300 - Smith

2022 Alachua Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRay Brady / John Flowers vs Markus Schneider / Kevin Smith6-7, 3-6
2022-03-13vs Alachua - DB/PuLost 02
L#1 DoublesRay Brady / Paul Askew vs Jian Pu / Jorg Bungert6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMalcolm Maden / Christopher Silver vs Daniel van Roy / Paul Folkers7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-02-26vs JTC - LancasterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Flowers / Malcolm Maden vs Lawrence Hooghuis / LEROY BROWN3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRay Brady / Paul Askew vs Thomas Yonge / Song Lai7-5, 6-2
2022-02-19vs Alachua - DB/PuLost 02
L#2 DoublesRay Brady / Paul Askew vs Jorg Bungert / Jerry Lu2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMalcolm Maden / Efren Vasquez vs Kevin Smith / Jian Pu1-6, 2-6
2022-02-05vs JTC - LancasterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRay Brady / Paul Askew vs James Araujo / Jack Jacobs6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMalcolm Maden / Christopher Silver vs Song Lai / Thomas Yonge6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-01-22vs Alachua - DB/PuWon 10
W#1 DoublesRay Brady / Paul Askew vs Ed Stark / Frank Kenlon7-6, 6-3
2022-01-15vs JTC - LancasterWon 20
W#1 DoublesRay Brady / Paul Askew vs Lawrence Hooghuis / LEROY BROWN7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRaymond Hopkins / Malcolm Maden vs Scott Lamp / William Landis4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Paul Askew
published
3.01
John Flowers
published
2.99
Ray Brady
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Malcolm Maden
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Richard Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ray Brady + Malcolm Maden0518% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Askew
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
John Flowers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
Ray Brady
31W–74L career · 7 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Christopher Silver
1W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Malcolm Maden
34W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Wright
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.