Teams

40-Luv

2022 40&Over Women · 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-25vs Alley KatsLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Simeone / Karina Sanzari vs Hannah Han / Grace Lee2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKoren Horsey / Deborah Felsenheld vs Connie Avramis / Mary Antony-Arora1-6, 0-6
2022-07-11vs Acing GracefullySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Vero / Deborah Felsenheld vs Joyce Schimmel / Denise Branca2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKarina Sanzari / Anne Marie Carroll vs Sara Beinstein / Robyn O'Hagan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-08vs Acing GracefullyLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Simeone / Karina Sanzari vs Joyce Schimmel / Sara Beinstein5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Marie Carroll / Sherry Bloom vs Leslie Gaul / Traci Egermayer3-6, 3-6
2022-06-27vs Alley KatsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Simeone / Karina Sanzari vs Connie Avramis / Jennifer Boucher0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Marie Carroll / Deborah Felsenheld vs Jody Riger / Dawn Davis6-1, 6-3
2022-06-13vs Acing GracefullyLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Simeone / Anthea Zito vs Joyce Schimmel / Denise Branca3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesYelena Pyatski vs Niena Jerdee3-6, 3-4
2022-06-06vs Alley KatsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Marie Carroll / Pauline Pellegrino vs Grace Lee / Hannah Han2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Alley Kats51191127205
240-Luv0662452333

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Karina Sanzari
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Anne Marie Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Deborah Felsenheld
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Diane Vero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Elizabeth Simeone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Yelena Pyatski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Simeone + Karina Sanzari6744% games−5.7% vs expected
Deborah Felsenheld + Diane Vero3443% games−10.6% vs expected
Karina Sanzari + Anne Marie Carroll134 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Simeone + Anne Marie Carroll123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karina Sanzari
42W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Anne Marie Carroll
8W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Deborah Felsenheld
20W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Diane Vero
22W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Simeone
22W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
Yelena Pyatski
9W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.