Teams

MC RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-26vs MC GREENLost 23
W#1 DoublesAnne Pielage / Palmira Miner vs Charlene Bailey / Maria Cochran2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJill Mendoza vs Cyndy Besselievre1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDoreen Evans / Sue Speyer vs Ana Hunsinger / Linda Manhkhong7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSummer Kusel vs Elisa Dannemiller6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesELIZABETH SKLAROFF / Martha Williams vs Kailyn Kampert / Karen Greenwood4-6, 1-6
2026-05-24vs NJ REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesKristen Phoenix / Anne Pielage vs Sheri Wright / Darcie Coy2-4
L#1 SinglesNicole Hemmer vs Kristin Williams4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesELIZABETH SKLAROFF / Martha Williams vs Mary Nelson / Shannon Tapia4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJill Mendoza vs Melissa Rhen6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDoreen Evans / Sue Speyer vs Sandra Lucero Jacquez / Morgan Cox6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-12vs BVP GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesMartha Williams / Kristen Phoenix vs Dorothy Monroe / Holly Harrison3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesELIZABETH SKLAROFF vs Heidi Halus4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Pielage / Joyce Jackson vs Bobbie Lutz / Katy Plath7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSummer Kusel vs Hatsady McCormick6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJane Lamotta / Sue Speyer vs Cara Phillips / Natalie Bailey3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-28vs NJ BLUEWon 32
W#1 DoublesSummer Kusel / Anne Pielage vs Tracie Cordeiro / Lauren Rivas6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJill Mendoza vs Terming Chew4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDoreen Evans / Palmira Miner vs Diana Guettlein / Madison Fortunato6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesELIZABETH SKLAROFF vs Kimberly Bonczynski6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoyce Jackson / Jane Lamotta vs Miki Aylesworth / Angela Harper2-6, 4-6
2026-04-21vs RHCC TEALWon 32
L#1 DoublesELIZABETH SKLAROFF / Kristen Phoenix vs Stephanie Joens / Briana Jackson0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Hemmer vs Carrie Warren6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPalmira Miner / Anne Pielage vs Darden Coors / Catherine Rossano6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesSummer Kusel vs Ashley Garber Browner7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Lamotta / Doreen Evans vs Jessica Tsuo / Stacey Anderson4-6, 2-6
2026-04-14vs LTC-D GREENWon 32
W#1 DoublesELIZABETH SKLAROFF / Kristen Phoenix vs Katie Shaw / Julia Kantor6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNicole Hemmer vs Lisa Christman6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnne Pielage / Jane Lamotta vs Erica Moser / Casey Rhine6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSummer Kusel vs Kristen Clauss5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDoreen Evans / Palmira Miner vs Lisa McGehee / Alyssa Cormack6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Nicole Hemmer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.84
Jill Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Jaime Stokes
published 4
3.72
Summer Kusel
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Anne Pielage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
ELIZABETH SKLAROFF
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.69
Doreen Evans
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Palmira Miner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Sue Speyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Martha Williams
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Jane Lamotta
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Kristen Phoenix
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Joyce Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doreen Evans + Palmira Miner14661% games+6.4% vs expected
Doreen Evans + Sue Speyer13458% games+1.0% vs expected
Doreen Evans + Summer Kusel5256% games−0.6% vs expected
Kristen Phoenix + ELIZABETH SKLAROFF213 matchesnot enough data
Palmira Miner + Anne Pielage213 matchesnot enough data
Summer Kusel + Anne Pielage123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Hemmer
35W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Jill Mendoza
105W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Jaime Stokes
29W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Summer Kusel
40W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Anne Pielage
33W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
ELIZABETH SKLAROFF
51W–62L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Doreen Evans
98W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Palmira Miner
92W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Sue Speyer
79W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Martha Williams
21W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Jane Lamotta
22W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kristen Phoenix
16W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Joyce Jackson
119W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.