← Teams

MAC-Thomas/Martel

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Whitney Palfreyman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Lori Bernhardt
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 4
—
Michaela Bancud
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
—
Susie Jansky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Mariko Clark
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Michelle Doherty
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.24
Dana McKillop
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-03-25Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Nikki Metcalf vs Annie Sumpter / Hong Allen6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMichelle Doherty vs Jannell Cuddy6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesFanny Adams / Lori Bernhardt vs Tina Clancy / Natalya Ramras6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-12Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesWhitney Palfreyman / Jeanette Thomas vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Heather Dudley7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJean Herbst / Mariko Clark vs Akemi Okusada / Patty Kleckner6-2, 6-0
2023-03-11Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesDana McKillop / Mariko Clark vs Kristie Leake / Kristin Spear6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Nikki Metcalf vs Bo Yu / Susan Ford6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichelle Doherty vs Janna McDougall6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Roberts / Lori Bernhardt vs Molly Shum / Sharon Kim-Geib6-3, 6-2
2023-03-04Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Pamela Hummelt vs Brooke Daugherty / Amy Bucher6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDana McKillop / Fanny Adams vs Shamera Daugherty / Cassia Carpio6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMichelle Doherty vs Wanda Nijholt6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJean Herbst / Mariko Clark vs Elizabeth Domagalski / Cathie Recker6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-02-19Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesNikki Metcalf / Michaela Bancud vs Vivian Nguyen / Beth Steffes6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Sally Lovett vs Shanay Goddard / Mayla Morgan6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichelle Doherty vs Dolores Corley6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusie Jansky / Jean Herbst vs Kara Gajowskyj / Tonya Halog6-1, 6-3
2023-01-21Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesWhitney Palfreyman / Jeanette Thomas vs Karen Mathews / Donna Roisom6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLori Bernhardt vs Lynne Gaerisch3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusie Jansky / Rebecca Roberts vs Gabriela Ghita / Amy Murphy6-3, 6-2
2023-01-20Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Nikki Metcalf vs Suzie Glenn / Crystal Bryant6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Hummelt / Dana McKillop vs Kari Martin / Barbara Seatter6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-01-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Michaela Bancud vs Kari Hastings / Inna Vlad6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusie Jansky / Whitney Palfreyman vs Ariana White / Gabriela McIntosh6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLori Bernhardt vs Erin Casey6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Whitney Palfreyman
25W–37L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4
Lori Bernhardt
28W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Michaela Bancud
26W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Susie Jansky
53W–45L career
not enough data
—
4
Mariko Clark
2W–6L career
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Michelle Doherty
27W–23L career
23%77%0%
3.57
4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Dana McKillop
23W–65L career
1%98%0%
3.24

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.