Teams

TeamRiviera

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.0 Adult Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Maira Maguire
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.81
Judy Prado
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.76
Allison Cohen
published 4
3.74
Tiffany Ortiz
published
3.73
Olga Grant
published
3.67
3.64
Maricarmen Diazmiron
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.60
Michele Magoulas
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.56
Andrea Gil
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Ashley Galvin
published 3.5
3.32
Yuliet Pellegrini
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Esther Surujon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Linda Lann
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Gil + Yuliet Pellegrini9360% games+1.1% vs expected
Michele Magoulas + Judy Prado1645% games+0.0% vs expected
Michele Magoulas + Yuliet Pellegrini211056% games−1.5% vs expected
Olga Grant + Andrea Mientkiewicz3645% games−1.7% vs expected
Judy Prado + Tiffany Ortiz6255% games−1.7% vs expected
Michele Magoulas + Maira Maguire8650% games−3.9% vs expected
Michele Magoulas + Andrea Gil362454% games−4.1% vs expected
Maricarmen Diazmiron + Michele Magoulas3446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maira Maguire
129W–107L career · 7 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Judy Prado
208W–126L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Allison Cohen
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Tiffany Ortiz
29W–25L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Olga Grant
25W–35L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Andrea Mientkiewicz
7W–21L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
Maricarmen Diazmiron
249W–150L career · 7 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michele Magoulas
145W–118L career · 7 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Andrea Gil
210W–155L career · 8 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Ashley Galvin
33W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Yuliet Pellegrini
206W–125L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Esther Surujon
62W–121L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Linda Lann
57W–144L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Veloz de Guillen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.