Teams

GSTL40/Repasky/RLTC

2025 Adult 40 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-03vs GSTL40/Brady/DunesLost 04
L#1 DoublesVera Reznik / Jama Hinson vs Amy Starnes / Kimberly Gore2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPatricia Werder vs Sarah Prinzi1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Godwin / Caroline Vymislicky vs Maryann Gaddy / Andrea Lazar0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBayou Pan / Terri Brobst vs Patty Gresko / Catherine Collins1-6, 2-6
2025-03-13vs GSTL40/Brady/DunesLost 04
L#1 DoublesCaroline Vymislicky / Jama Hinson vs Nikki Godwin / Amy Starnes3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPatricia Werder vs Ashley DiSabato5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Repasky / Lauren Godwin vs Susan Brady / Georgeanne Rice4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTerri Brobst / Vera Reznik vs Margaret Singleton / Catherine Collins5-7, 4-6
2025-02-23vs GSTL40/Brady/DunesLost 04
L#1 DoublesLynn Repasky / Terri Brobst vs Kimberly Gore / Patty Gresko1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Banning vs Jennifer Phillips0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Vymislicky / Lauren Godwin vs Maryann Gaddy / Pamela Yates3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJama Hinson / Patricia Werder vs Brooke David / Andrea Lazar4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bayou Pan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Caroline Vymislicky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Patricia Werder
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Karen Banning
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.45
Vera Reznik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Lynn Repasky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Mary Buchanan
published
2.11
Ann Parker
published 2.5
Jama Hinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Godwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Brobst
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bayou Pan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Caroline Vymislicky
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Werder
15W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Karen Banning
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Vera Reznik
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45
Lynn Repasky
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
Mary Buchanan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34
2.5
Ann Parker
2W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jama Hinson
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Godwin
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Brobst
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.