Teams

McGee/40/3.5/MD/For

2025 Monroe Mixed 40 & Over · 3.5 Monroe (40&O) Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-21vs Meche/40's/3.5MD/BDCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Vingiello / Elizabeth Guerriero vs Richard Ainsworth / Renee Wilhite6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShane Faulkner / Wesley Johnson vs Sharon Dollins / William Meche6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesThomas Leoty / Janis Battaglia vs Andrew Eaton / Kimberly Leija4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-07-14vs Meche/40's/3.5MD/BDCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike McGee / Erica Norris vs Richard Ainsworth / Renee Wilhite6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Cruz / Janis Battaglia vs William Meche / Kimberly Leija6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesShane Faulkner / Diana Breen vs Andrew Eaton / Sharon Dollins7-6, 7-5
2025-07-12vs Meche/40's/3.5MD/BDCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanis Battaglia / Andy Cruz vs Richard Ainsworth / Renee Wilhite6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMike McGee / Diana Breen vs Sharon Dollins / William Meche6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWesley Johnson / Brandon Kelley vs Andrew Eaton / Kimberly Leija7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-28vs Meche/40's/3.5MD/BDCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesWesley Johnson / Brandon Kelley vs Andrew Eaton / Kimberly Leija6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Leoty / Erica Norris vs Sharon Dollins / William Meche6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Guerriero / Paul Vingiello vs Richard Ainsworth / Renee Wilhite6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Monroe (40&O) Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Erica Norris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Shane Faulkner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Janis Battaglia
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Wesley Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Andy Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Elizabeth Guerriero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Diana Breen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mike McGee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Vingiello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Leoty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Norris
21W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Shane Faulkner
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Janis Battaglia
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Wesley Johnson
22W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Andy Cruz
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Guerriero
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Diana Breen
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Mike McGee
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Vingiello
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Leoty
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.