Teams

TOHS.Friedman

2023 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-24vs TOC.KimLost 12
W#1 SinglesDanelle Alex vs Lauren Kane6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Laura Robison3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMichelle Alarcon vs Yuna Kim0-6, 6-7
2023-08-17Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Madeline Cambo4-6, 1-6
2023-08-03vs TOC.KimLost 01
L#2 SinglesPaula Laine vs Lauren Kane0-6, 2-6
2023-07-27vs TOC.AroraSplit 11
L#1 SinglesClaudia Bourbeau vs Jennifer Waychoff0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Hema Pandey1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-13vs TOC.KimLost 01
L#2 SinglesDanelle Alex vs Sue Mooney3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-29vs TOC.AroraLost 03
L#1 SinglesMichelle Alarcon vs Jennifer Waychoff0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesClaudia Bourbeau vs Shanie Kpanay5-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Madeline Cambo2-6, 0-6
2023-06-15vs TOC.KimLost 02
L#1 SinglesDanelle Alex vs Christine Qubeck6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesPaula Laine vs Laura Robison7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-08Lost 01
L#3 SinglesDanelle Alex vs Fang Cai6-1, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Danelle Alex
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
Michelle Alarcon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.45
Claudia Bourbeau
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.41
Belinda Berling
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.33
Paula Laine
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.23
Brittany Friedman
published 2.5
2.04
Joy Phillips
published
1.73
MacOn Hollister
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Alarcon + Paula Laine9652% games+3.7% vs expected
Michelle Alarcon + Claudia Bourbeau91350% games+3.6% vs expected
Belinda Berling + Danelle Alex2353% gamesnot enough data
Brittany Friedman + Belinda Berling224 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Bourbeau + Paula Laine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Danelle Alex
105W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.24
2.5
Michelle Alarcon
69W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%22%78%
2.60
3
Claudia Bourbeau
36W–85L career · 2 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.45
2.5
Belinda Berling
37W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Paula Laine
64W–114L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Brittany Friedman
10W–20L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23
Joy Phillips
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.04
MacOn Hollister
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.