Teams

NJ Rockstars

2026 18&Over Women · 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-14vs PEM: NJ RockstarsWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdith Wisniewski / Sabrina Rodriguez vs Valeria Kulynych / Kerrin Malatesta6-2, 6-3
2026-06-30vs Queens of the CourtSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlia Rind vs Karen Altamirano6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVirmar Sosa / Anna Walz vs Cecilia Wong / Wei Liu4-6, 3-6
2026-06-25vs Alley-gatorsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlia Rind vs Rachana Kenkare4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSabrina Rodriguez / Anna Walz vs Armida Tarquinio / Maria Zoine6-3, 5-3
2026-06-18vs MSU: ACESLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Bradley / Alia Rind vs Lynne Ainge / Elizabeth McCulloch2-6, 3-6
2026-05-28vs Honey DeucesLost 01
L#2 DoublesIsmary Boyd / Edith Wisniewski vs Kerrin Malatesta / Mary Pezzella1-6, 4-6
2026-05-21vs Alley-gatorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Velazquez / Anna Walz vs Chantley Thomas / Karen Roszak6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAlia Rind vs Hiral Soni0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-14vs MSU: ACESLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristiane Mahoney / Donna Zitelli vs Elizabeth McCulloch / Gina LaForte1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEdith Wisniewski / Alia Rind vs Jeanette Chown-Santoro / Olawa Gibson3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesFrancine Lusardi vs Susan Roos6-4, 6-3
2026-05-07vs Queens of the CourtSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDonna Zitelli vs ANN FORSLUND6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEdith Wisniewski / Anna Walz vs Karen Altamirano / Karolina Li5-7, 5-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Christiane Mahoney
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
3.04
Maria Velazquez
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.01
Jennifer Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
2.94
Diana Arce
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Edith Wisniewski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Donna Zitelli
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.84
Francine Lusardi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.80
Juhi Malkani
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.78
Shelly He
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Yiyun Li
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.76
Sabrina Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Ismary Boyd
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Anna Walz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Alia Rind
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.36
Virmar Sosa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Velazquez + Jennifer Hughes19856% games+7.8% vs expected
Alia Rind + Virmar Sosa044 matchesnot enough data
Virmar Sosa + Sabrina Rodriguez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christiane Mahoney
64W–80L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Maria Velazquez
43W–41L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Jennifer Hughes
47W–20L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Diana Arce
14W–5L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Edith Wisniewski
54W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Donna Zitelli
9W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Francine Lusardi
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Juhi Malkani
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Shelly He
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
Yiyun Li
4W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Sabrina Rodriguez
12W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ismary Boyd
5W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Anna Walz
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Alia Rind
10W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Virmar Sosa
9W–45L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.