Teams

On the Line

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-20vs Net NutsLost 02
L#2 SinglesMargaret Sita vs Cathy Huh3-6, 2-1
L#3 DoublesFaye Henris / Alice Edmondson vs Leigh MacDonald / Ayaka Murphy2-6, 3-6
2021-05-13vs Friends of CourtWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlice Edmondson / Faye Henris vs Alison Duenkel / Renee Wall6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeggy Neils / Diane Baird vs Erin Mascatello / Erin Kaplan7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJaynelynn McCormick / Patricia Yeates vs Boni Vinter / Linda Donaldson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-06vs Double TroubleLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlice Edmondson / Jaynelynn McCormick vs Polly Middleton / Angela Goodman5-7, 4-3
L#2 DoublesRachel Fritz / Peggy Neils vs Julia Dahlberg / Sherry Haideri6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-22vs Team KruegerWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlice Edmondson / Faye Henris vs Eileen Smith / Margaret Vermillion7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMargaret Sita vs Amy Maron6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJaynelynn McCormick / Shirley Burdette vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-15vs Spring ChicksLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlice Edmondson / Faye Henris vs Leah Noonan / Theresa Mullally3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeggy Neils / Rachel Fritz vs Blair Reid / Colleen Stoltz2-6, 0-6
2021-04-08vs 10s JunkiesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlice Edmondson / Faye Henris vs Wendy Hopkins / Jacqueline Lawlor6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPeggy Neils / Rachel Fritz vs Rohini Chopra / June Wheatley6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMargaret Sita vs Rebecca Sech6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Margaret Sita
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Jaynelynn McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Peggy Neils
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Wendy Hahn
published
3.46
Patricia Yeates
published
3.37
Lori Reed
published
3.31
Alice Edmondson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Lucy Hurd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Sita + Peggy Neils311062% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Margaret Sita
100W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Jaynelynn McCormick
30W–25L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Peggy Neils
62W–35L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
Wendy Hahn
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.52
Patricia Yeates
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
Lori Reed
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%0%
3.37
3.5
Alice Edmondson
22W–21L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Lucy Hurd
6W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.