Teams

WNCL Maggard (CCA)

Adult 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ Adult Women 3.5 Wed

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-20vs WNCA Guthy (ARC South)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesLauren Maggard / Evie Tashie vs Kara Candler / Catherine Mitchell2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJenifer Bolton vs Caroline Perry2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Schoen / Johanna Spellman vs Stephanie Mason / Lee Lowe6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesReagan Bromiley vs Anna Guthy2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSundri Simon / Stacey Dansky vs Darcey Kennedy / Kylie Hopkins4-6, 5-7
2026-05-13vs WNCA Trnka (Aston Park)Won 41
W#1 DoublesLauren Maggard / Leeann Kelley vs Megan Bennett / Katherine Gutschenritter7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAni Kinyon vs Eva Tune3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Dansky / Elizabeth Schoen vs Beth Mahan / Maureen Bowdren6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesReagan Bromiley vs Lindsey Wilson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenifer Bolton / Sundri Simon vs Andrea Smith / Arianna Bovo Trnka6-3, 6-2
2026-04-29vs WNCC Common (Aston Park)Won 32
W#1 DoublesLauren Maggard / Evie Tashie vs Jennifer Malt / Zsuzsanna Brooks6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Schoen vs Becky Robinson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeeann Kelley / Sundri Simon vs Nicole O'Brien / Caitlin Van Hecke6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJenifer Bolton vs Jenni Trimble7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAni Kinyon / Johanna Spellman vs Mindy Nelson / Tammy Wright3-6, 1-6
2026-04-26vs WNCC Anders (ARC South)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesStacey Dansky / Elizabeth Schoen vs Audrey Fortezzo / Tricia Lancor3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAni Kinyon vs Karolina Drozdz1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Maggard / Evie Tashie vs Sarah Landis / Andi Elliot6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesReagan Bromiley vs Caroline Anders2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohanna Spellman / Jenifer Bolton vs Alice Chen / Gina Livingston2-6, 3-6
2026-04-22vs WNCA Murray (Brevard)Split 22
W#1 DoublesLeeann Kelley / Elizabeth Schoen vs Heidi Spradlin / Mary Eccles Thompson6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLauren Maggard / Evie Tashie vs Kim McKibbin / Andrea Smith6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJenifer Bolton vs Alexandra Murray0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohanna Spellman / Reagan Bromiley vs Kyndra Prescott / Eileen Garvey3-6, 0-6
2026-04-15vs WNCC Mohammed (HRC)Lost 23
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Schoen / Leeann Kelley vs Denise Jackson / Martha Habegger3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesReagan Bromiley vs Kelly Gillis2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Maggard / Evie Tashie vs Quenton Wright / Catalina Knutson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAni Kinyon vs Sharlyn Aamodt1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Scully / Sundri Simon vs TLynn Gilpin / Angie Rardin6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Women 3.5 Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Leeann Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Evie Tashie
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Lauren Maggard
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Paige Scully
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Elizabeth Schoen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Stacey Dansky
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Johanna Spellman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Reagan Bromiley
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Ani Kinyon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Laura Dover
published
2.81
Justine Amdur
published
2.79
Jenifer Bolton
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.69
Sundri Simon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evie Tashie + Lauren Maggard6449% games−1.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Schoen + Leeann Kelley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leeann Kelley
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Evie Tashie
13W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
Lauren Maggard
10W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Paige Scully
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Elizabeth Schoen
8W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Stacey Dansky
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Johanna Spellman
1W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Reagan Bromiley
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Ani Kinyon
2W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Laura Dover
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.98
Justine Amdur
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Jenifer Bolton
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.79
Sundri Simon
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.