Teams

8.5 Team #2

2023 ITA MIXED · MXD 8.5 - 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-27vs Montana/Sparks/ITA8.5MXLost 02
L#2 DoublesCyndy Desin / Joel Thompson vs Jesse Chavez / Sarah Bach4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTessa Jochim / Michael Turley vs Hanna Grow-Morales / Taylor Jean0-6, 3-6
2023-08-27vs Montana/Sparks/ITA8.5MXLost 02
L#2 DoublesCyndy Desin / Joel Thompson vs Hanna Grow-Morales / Taylor Jean2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTessa Jochim / Michael Turley vs Amber Sparks / Austin Stege1-6, 2-6
2023-08-26vs Montana/Sparks/ITA8.5MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaige Darden / Michael Turley vs David Dernbach / Becky King4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCyndy Desin / Joel Thompson vs Amber Sparks / Austin Stege5-7, 4-6
2023-08-26vs Montana/Sparks/ITA8.5MXLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoel Thompson / Cyndy Desin vs Jesse Chavez / Hanna Grow-Morales6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaige Darden / Michael Turley vs Sarah Bach / Taylor Jean3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MXD 8.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Sparks/ITA8.5MX40111389
28.5 Team #20411122140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Nelson Miller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Ann Jackson
published 3.5
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joel Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Turley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Paige Darden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tessa Jochim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyndy Desin + Joel Thompson0839% games+12.4% vs expected
Tessa Jochim + Michael Turley0624% gamesnot enough data
Paige Darden + Michael Turley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nelson Miller
32W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.28
3.5
Ann Jackson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.93
Joel Thompson
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Turley
10W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Paige Darden
23W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tessa Jochim
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.