Teams

CSCHAUMAN18

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-15vs JBYRD-CAPLost 02
L#1 DoublesCraig Schauman / Peter Blankenship vs Tommy Hibbs / Jermaine Byrd2-6, 2-5
L#2 DoublesBrian Baron / Nile Testerman vs Joon Kang / Wes Watson4-6, 2-5
2022-05-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesConnor Funk / Nile Testerman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-24vs BKOREN18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNile Testerman / Paul Weisner vs Victor Meir / Avery Sparrow1-6, 1-6
2022-04-13vs BKOREN18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Baron / Craig Schauman vs Victor Meir / James JR Compton0-6, 5-7
2022-04-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNile Testerman / Craig Schauman vs Michael Ladd / Matthew Short2-6, 3-6
2022-04-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Schauman / Tyler Newman vs Tate Brandt / Isaac Hardison2-6, 4-6
2022-03-27vs BHardwickLost 01
L#2 DoublesNile Testerman / Connor Funk vs Sean Heuser / Andy Scott6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-03-20vs JBYRD-CAPLost 02
L#1 DoublesTyler Newman / Nile Testerman vs Daniel Segan / Geoffrey Vollman2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesCraig Schauman vs Beomjun Ju1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
William Sendor
published
4.21
Patrick Grant
published
4.20
Raymond Xu
published
4.15
Connor Funk
published 4.5
4.08
Eric Chima
published 4.5
4.05
Peter Blankenship
published
3.87
Brian Baron
published 4
3.76
Nile Testerman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.73
Justin Fowler
published
3.68
3.61
Craig Schauman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Grant + Raymond Xu4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Sendor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
Patrick Grant
20W–23L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
Raymond Xu
30W–23L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Connor Funk
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Eric Chima
6W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
Peter Blankenship
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Brian Baron
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Nile Testerman
76W–122L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Justin Fowler
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Enric Prat Codina
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Craig Schauman
163W–154L career · 8 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.